Guest guest Posted February 13, 2000 Report Share Posted February 13, 2000 >> The truth, as I see it, is that Aloneness is - there can be no >> sharing of Aloneness with anyone. > > " It " can be " pointed " to using words. How could " it " not, as words are not >separate from " it? " D: Speak as you wish, Tim. No problem here. However, no word can possibly contain or convey it. It isn't word-meanings, and if taken as such, the mind simply becomes involved with its own processes rather than sacrifice, rather than 'open'. >Hopefully, you do not assume that to be the case with " me! " D: Nothing that I've written has to do with any assumption about what might be the case with " you " -- >> ... As I see this, >> I move from " helping " to " pure simple acceptance/surrender/being " . > >Is there impure acceptance/surrender/being? And again, is a teaching >offered with no motive not a movement of/within Awareness? D: Yes, Tim. There is less than full acceptance/surrender/being. Because there is, we deal with crime, abuse, war, rape, deceit, manipulation. Such " impurity " may be considered an illusion from an ultimate perspective, but while it persists it's real enough in its own " sphere of influence " ... As far as a teaching offered with no motive, I didn't comment on the existence of nonexistence of " others' motives, " including " yours " , was speaking from " my own experience " . -- Love -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.