Guest guest Posted February 13, 2000 Report Share Posted February 13, 2000 " Joyce Short " <insight Hi Victor - Im starting to write the commentary to the text - there are statements in italics from the text and then the commentary but I dont know how to get italics on the email so will use capital letters for text. Introductory Section of the Root Text The text we are studying consists of a brief versified root text and an autocommentary, i.e. Paltrul Rincoche's expanded prose explanation of his own root text. He begins his commentary with the invocation, " I PAY HOMAGE TO THE KIND ROOT GURU WHO IS THE UNEQUALED EMBODIMENT OF COMPASSION. " With regard to the characterization of his root guru as a supreme embodiment of compassion, in general we would say that of course no one is superior to the Buddha. But since we are unable, at this time, to meet Buddha Shakyamuni, we are unable to receive instruction from him directly. Nevertheless, we do have the good fortune to meet our personal teachers, our root gurus, and these root gurus manifest in our world in a way that allows us to communicate with them directly, to approach them personally, and it is only on the basis of such closeness that we receive instruction and are lead to buddhahood. Hence, while no one is superior to the Buddha in an objective sense, from our own subjective point of view, we would have to say that the root guru is in effect kinder to us than even the Buddha. Furthermore, when you pay homage to your teacher, as Paltrul Rinpoche does here, you do by implication pay homage to the Three Jewels as well, because your acquaintance with or exposure to the Three Jewels depends entirely on the instruction you receive from your teachers. In that sense, the guru's mind is the Buddha, his or her speech is the Dharma, and his or her body is the Sangha. What we discussed are the first words in the autocommentary, and they provide a commentary on the first line of the root text which reads, " I PAY HOMAGE TO THE GURU. " The essence of all of the view, meditation and conduct of the Great Perfection is really included in the realization that one's root guru and all the lineage guru's are inseparable from one's own mind, that they are not to be found outside of one's own mind. In order to point that out, the text begins with a three-line description of view, meditation, and conduct, using the names of lineage gurus to describe the qualities of these different aspects of the path of the Great Perfection. The first of these three lines reads, " THE VIEW IS THE BOUNDLESS GREAT EXPANSE. " " Boundless great expanse " in Tibetan is " longchen rabjam " which is the name of the Omniscient Longchenpa. The meaning of this line is that all of the appearances of samsara are complete within, or never pass beyond, the great expanse of suchness and of sameness, which is the very nature of the awareness of each and every being, the sugatagarbha, or Buddha-nature, the nature of all things, an expanse that is totally beyond elaboration, beyond conceptualization. Because the understanding of that is the " view " of the Great Perfection, the first line reads, " THE VIEW IS THE BOUNDLESS GREAT EXPANSE. " The second of these lines reads, " MEDITATION IS THE LIGHT RAYS OF WISDOM AND LOVINGKINDNESS. " " Light rays of wisdom and lovingkindness, " or " khyentse oser " in Tibetan, is the personal name of the omniscient Jigme Lingpa. Here again, we find that the name of the guru is used to decribe the quality of meditation. The meditation is the cultivation of the view, and the view is the ascertainment of the nature of all things being beyond elaboration. The recognition of the view is an insight, or a vipashyana; it is a wisdom or a prajna, and that wisdom is actually revealed through the practice of meditation. The revelation by means of wisdom, of the wisdom of emptiness as the nature of all things, is one of the two aspects of meditation that must be present. For this to occur properly, this generation of insight must be founded in a one-pointed even placement, of shamatha, that is of the nature of great compassion, of a nonconceptual, all-pervasive loving-kindness and compassion. In other words, the emptiness that is reavealed by insight must be experienced with compassion. The insight itself must be conjoined with tranquility, and therefore, the knowledge aspect, the prajna aspect, must never be separated from the method aspect, the upaya aspect. This defines the meditation of the Great Perfection: a cognition of emptiness, the affect of which is compassion. Therefore, the text says, " MEDITATION IS THE LIGHT RAYS OF WISDOM AND LOVING-KINDNESS. " The third line reads, " CONDUCT IS THE CHILD OF THE BUDDHAS. " Of course, Gyalwai Nyugu, " child of the buddhas. " is the name of Paltrul Rinpoche's root guru, the student of Jigme Lingpa. But this is not a random application; it has a particular significance. When someone is engaged in such meditation as was described in the previous line, then the conduct which is the natural outflow of that meditation in post meditation is the conduct of a bodhisattva. The term " sprout of the victors, " or " child of the buddhas, " is synonymous with bodhisattva; in fact, it can be used as a generic title for all bodhisattvas. The conduct of the Great Perfection is the implementation of the six perfections of the bodhisattva path for the benefit of others, and therefore, the text says, " THE CONDUCT IS THE CHILD OF THE VICTORS. " The next two lines of the text actually have to be treated together because they form a statement in two lines which reads, " FOR SOMEONE WHO PRACTICES IN THAT WAY, THERE IS NO DIFFICULTY IN ATTAINING BUDDHAHOOD IN THIS VERY LIFE. " Paltrul Rinppche's intention in this line is to remind us how fortunate we are to possess the opportunity to practice the view, meditation, and conduct of the Great Perfection. We are fortunate because one only gains the opportunity to encounter and implement this practice if one has gathered vast accumulations both of merit and of wisdom in previous lifetimes. If someone really puts the teachings of the Great Perfection into practice, then it is entirely possible that they can attain full awakening in this very life. To truly implement these teachings means to rely upon practice in solitary retreat and to totally abandon the activities of this world and this life, to abandon the obsessive concern that we normally have with attempting to protect our friends and subdue our enemies, and with so many other things. If you can in that way practice one-pointedly, then in this life you will come to be liberated in the ground of primordial purity. Even if you are unable to practice with that degree of diligence and austerity, just by directing your mind towards the cultivation of this view, meditation and conduct, you will attain the ability to take unpleasant circumstances as the path. You will be able to not be unseated or overly disturbed by various distasters, sickness and emotional upheavels that may occur, and you will be freed from excessive anxiety and hope with regard to the outcome of your various plans in this life. These will be the benefits that will accrue in this life, and in future lives you will go from bliss to bliss, which means that a momentum will be established by your practice so that in each life you will come closer to buddhahood until you finally attain it. In order to express all of this, continuing from where it said, " THERE IS NO DIFFICULTY ABOUT ATTAINING BUDDHAHOOD IN ONE LIFE, " the root text says, " AND EVEN IF NOT, YOU WILL BE SO HAPPY. " " These are the benefits of the view, meditation and conduct of the Great Perfection. Both the root text and the commentary then continue to actually explain these three aspects of the path; first the view, then the meditation, then the conduct. Most of the explanation will be concerned with the view. The next line in the root text is almost identical to one found at the beginning. It just says, " THE VIEW OF THE BOUNDLESS VAST EXPANSE: " - in English, we would place a colon at the end. This is just a heading that introduces an extensive explanation of what the view is. Earlier, we translated the title of this text as the " Three Words That Hit the Point. " This phrase refers to the specific manner in which the teaching is expounded in the text. Even though literally the title is " Three Words That Hit the Point, " Garab Dorje's injunctions actually are not individual words. Rather they are phrases, and it would be more correct to say " three points " or " three injunctions. " The image intended is that these three points are so incisive, so telling in a resolution of the view, that they are like weapons that kill something on the spot. What they kill is confusion. They are like a butcher who is expert at killing and knows exactly where to hit an animal so that it drops dead on the spot. So therefore, the next line of the root text reads, " HIT THE POINT WITH THREE WORDS. " THE FIRST WORD: RECOGNIZE YOUR NATURE (the View) The first of these Three Words is the method by which the view of the Great Perfection may be identified, if one has not yet recognized the view. Within the various vehicles of Buddhadharma there exist different ways of presenting their respective views. In the causal vehicles, i.e. the various traditions connected with the sutras, the view is established by means of scripture and of reasoning and logical analysis. In the common tradition of Secret Mantra, i.e. the Vajrayana in general, the view is pointed out by means of the fourth stage of empowerment which depends upon the example, or similitude, established in the third stage of empowerment, and there exist many different ways of doing this. However, in Dzogchen neither of these two means is used. The holders of the practice lineages i.e. the lineages that have come from the adibuddha Samantabhadra down to Garab Dorje and through his lineage successors down to the present day, have always introduced the view to students by means of pointing out the dissolution of mind, pointing out where conceptual mind dissolves or disappears. For this to be successful, there first has to be some pacification of coarse conceptuality. If your mind is agitated by waves of confused thought, then these coarse thoughts, which are your mind running after various objects, obscure the true face of your mind. Under such circumstances, because of this obscuration by thought, you will not be able to identify and recognize your mind's true nature, even if your teacher points it out to you. At a minimum, coarse conceptuality must be allowed to be pacified naturally. Therefore, the next line of the root text says, " FIRST, ALLOW YOUR MIND TO SETTLE IN RELAXATION. " Neither allow mind to be distracted nor attempt to fabricate anything, and in particular, do not try to figure it out. While it is the case that one's mind, allowed to rest naturally, is itself the luminous wisdom that one attempts to identify, one will not be able to recognize the nature of the mind as long as there is any fabrication present. Although the basic instruction is simple, namely to allow mind to settle completely and thereby to recognize the innate wisdom that is always present, for beginners, it is impossible for there not to be adulteration of some clinging to the various phenomena and experiences that arise. As one allows one's mind to come to rest the various qualities of that stillness will naturally arise, such as a sense of ease or bliss, an experience of clarity, and an experience of absence of conceptuality. There is nothing wrong with thrse experiences in themselves, but as long as one is a beginner, it is impossible that one not be caught by them, because one is experiencing a bliss and clarity and non-thought that one has never known before. Something must be introduced into one's practice that would enable one to break through the clinging to these experiences that will naturally arise. There has to be something that frees one from this fixation, because any fixation will obscure the recognition. What is necessary is something that will break through the shell of clinging and cause the innate wisdom to be unleashed, so that naked awareness is displayed unobstructedly. The next line leads up to what is needed, " THEREFORE, WHEN ONE IS AT REST IN THAT STATE, RESTING RELAXED AND EVENLY..... " What is to be done is indicated in the line that follows, " SHOUT A SUDDEN PIERCING 'PHAT'. " What does shouting " phat " do, and how does one shout " phat? " The function of shouting " phat " (pronounced " pay " ) is twofold. it cuts off the flow of conceptuality; it interrupts it. And it destroys any conceptual meditation. Anything conceptual, either meditative or non-meditative, that is occurring in your mind when you shout " phat " , will be interrupted. For this to work, it is essential that one shout it in a certain way: it has to be short, sharp and fierce! Thus, the next line in the root text, continuing after the line that said, " SHOUT A PIERCING 'PHAT' THAT STRIKES THE MIND, " is, " FIERCE, SHARP AND SHORT. HOW WONDERFUL! " This means that you do not waft the sound " phat " on the wind in a melodious way. You also do not plan it and crank yourself up; you do not think, " OK Im going to shout " phat " now. " You do not prepare yourself for it. It should be sudden and abrupt - like thunder and lightening. Now why does Paltrul Rinpoche say, " How wonderful! " regarding this shouting of " phat? " What is so wonderful about doing this? When you do this, your mind loses for an instant all directedness, all fixation - and that is liberation. In that instant, there is a flash of liberation. This is described in the next line of the root text which says, " AN OPENNESS THAT IS NOTHING WHATSOEVER, " that cannot be characterized in any way as " this " or " that. " This experience of the state of dharmakaya, of the nature of things, which is characterized by being without any directedness or focus or fixation, is the wisdom that totally transcends the mind as we know it, it is the naked, unobscured experience of unobstructed awareness. In order to describe this, the next line says, " IT IS OPEN AND YET UNOBSTRUCTED. " I will give several translations of this line because there are no exact English equivalents of the Tibetan words in this sentence. The Tibetan word " hedewa, " translated here as " open " means something like " blank, " but this does not imply obscurity; it has a connotation almost of " glaring. " As to the other word in this line, " sang telewa, " think of it as three words all in one - " penentrating, " " transparent, " and " unobscured " or " unobstructed. " Hence, the line says that this state is characterized by an openness, an absence of any kind of limitation, that is nontheless an unobstructed or penetrating lucidity. This unobstructed awareness totally transcends any form of elaboration and is beyond existence and non-existence. It is unborn and unceasing. This inexpressible, innate wisdom totally transcends any attempt we might make to describe it or even to think of it. So therefore, the next line reads, " THIS TOTALLY OPEN, TRANSPARENT AWARENESS IS INEXPRESSIBLE. " The dharmakaya awareness which abides as the ground of one's being, which is the primordial purity beyond elaboration, is the very essence of the path of a practitioner of the Great Perfection. Until this one thing is recognized, no matter how much you meditate and no matter what you practice, it can never be anything other than a contrived and intellectually fabricated view and meditation. If this is not recognized, then no matter what you do and how you do it, you are farther away from the practice of the Great Perfection than the earth is from the sky. In other words, there is more distance between fabricated meditation and Dzogchen than there is between the earth and the sky. Until one recognizes this, one does not possess this essential point of continuous non-meditation, of uninterruptedly encountering one's own natural lucidity or luminosity. To recognize this is the most important thing of all, and therefore, the next line of the text says, " RECOGNIZE THIS DHARMAKAYA AWARENESS. " This recognition is the first of the three vital points, and it constitutes the view. If the view has not been recognized, then there is nothing to maintain in meditation, since meditation is simply not being distracted from the view. So therefore, right at the beginning, this recognition or identification or awareness is essential. Furthermore, this is only the recognition of a wisdom that is innate within oneself. It is not at all like looking for, or trying to recognize, something outside oneself. Nor is it the generation of something new within the continuum of mind. It is not the case that this wisdom is not present until recognition is present. This innate wisdom has always been there. The only difference is that now one recognizes it, but this recognition did not generate the wisdom. Because what is recognized is something that has always been present within oneself, this first point is called " recognition within oneself. " So of the " three words, " which we would rather think of as three phrases or three points, the first is " recognition within oneself, " and we have completed then that first of the three points. " ..........to be continued. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.