Guest guest Posted February 14, 2000 Report Share Posted February 14, 2000 At 11:13 AM 2/13/00 -0800, you wrote: >Tim Gerchmez <core > > >Dear Dan, > >At 12:54 PM 2/13/2000 -0500, you wrote: >> " Dan Berkow, PhD " <berkowd > >>D: Yes, Tim. There is less than full acceptance/surrender/being. >> Because there is, we deal with crime, abuse, war, rape, deceit, >> manipulation. > >There must be a perceiver of these things (which are " external to it " ). >That perceiver must be " Dan Berkow. " D: I'm not at all sure how you conclude that, Tim. There is no perceiver. A name is hung on a body... :-) >Who do you refer to in the above paragraph when you say " we? " Is it fair >to claim that " we " deal with these things? D: Tim, the " we " is the human race... It's observable behavior... >> As far as a teaching offered with no motive, >> I didn't comment on the existence of nonexistence of >> " others' motives, " including " yours " , was speaking from >> " my own experience " . > >Am " I " doing anything different on " my web site? " Just speaking there from > " my own experience. " The words on the web page arose within Awareness and >exist within Awareness. They are temporary in your so-called " relative >sphere " and will subside again into Awareness. In your " ultimate sphere, " >they never arose, nor did they fail to arise. > >An old pond >a frog jumps in >plop. Yes. Frog jumps in. Thus, no frog, no pond. " Plop " reverberates... Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.