Guest guest Posted March 7, 2000 Report Share Posted March 7, 2000 Dear Dan, >Reflecting involves twoness, the reflector and that which >is reflected. I'm not sure. In deep reflection, the reflector and the reflected upon dissolve (or are seen as the illusions they are), if there is interest -- and only the reflection itself remains. There is no duality in the pure action of love. Seeing is nondual - but when a seer and something seen come into the picture, duality enters. What the mind has trouble grasping is that it creates the perceiver and the perceived, and is itself both perceiver and perceived. The perception itself is non-dual. This is pretty easy to see when deeply involved in reading an interesting book. Are you there, is the book there? >Nonreflecting is nontwoness. It is also nonreflecting. There is a time for reflecting, certainly not to be pushed away or rejected when such times arise. >Perception now involves >nontwoness, no separation of perceiver and perceived. Why should there be separation? There never was a perceiver or a perceived, only perception. Love Always, Tim ----- " Apart from thoughts, there is no independent entity called the world. " -- Ramana Maharshi Visit " The Core " Website at http://coresite.cjb.net - Music, Poetry, Writings on Non-dual Spiritual Topics. Tim's other pages are at: http://core.vdirect.net. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.