Guest guest Posted April 7, 2000 Report Share Posted April 7, 2000 At 04:56 PM 4/6/00 -0700, you wrote: >At 02:17 PM 4/6/2000 -0400, you wrote: > >>There is no mind. Therefore, there >> can be no contents of the mind. >> >>-- D. -- > >Then I ask kindly for an explanation: What is it that knows how to type, >remembers how to write, and makes the claim (in writing): " There is no mind? " D: Tim - I suggest dropping the attempt to explain everything. An explanation is the past attempting to catch up to the present. It never will. The fullness of presentness needs no explanation. >Instead of saying " Why ask for explanations, " I request that you give one >anyway, just to humor me. D: You request an explanation for that which is inexplicable. You seek to define that which is beyond definition. In so doing, you place yourself apart from the truth that is openness beyond words. To ask why is to separate - it is to seek to use one statement to associate to another. There is That which is associated with nothing outside of itself. That is pure inexplicability. That is the definition of That. That is the answer to your request. Love -- -- Dan -- >With Love, > >Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.