The fallacy of assertions (part 2)

[Guest guest]

Hi San --

 

These passages from J.

are quite good!

Thanks!

 

Particularly this:

 

" Thus the word, Satchidananda,

Used to refer to the Self,

Does not really describe Its nature,

But merely signifies

That It is not the opposite of this. "

 

Which is to say that, oppositions

are not really opposite, they

simply allow expression.

What is expressed (manifested)

and what isn't expressed (unmanifest),

being the same, oppositions

have never divided anything.

 

And this:

 

" After such a discourse,

That speech is wise

Which drinks deeply of silence.

 

Truly, there is neither bondage nor freedom;

There is nothing to be accomplished.

There is only the pleasure of expounding. "

 

There is nothing to be fixed.

Wanting to fix something, something

needing to be fixed automatically appears!

 

 

> PS: Is this Dan the same Dan as on the NDS, NOJ,

L & S etc etc? <s>

 

Yes! <s>

 

And it's the same pleasure

discoursing and expounding with you,

San!

 

-- Dan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?

Donate cash, emergency relief information

http://dailynews./fc/US/Emergency_Information/