Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 > > Judi: GARY!!!! Don't make me come over there!! :-) > Gary: I can't tell if that's a threat or an offer. Hey, there's only one sure way to find out. Whatever happens, please post some pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 > Gary Schouborg wrote: >> >> By San's dualistic, simulated non-dual account, we can say nothing >> about >> > <<<<snipped>>> > > ***** GARY!!!! Don't make me come over there!! :-) > > Judi > I can't tell if that's a threat or an offer. Gary Gary Schouborg Performance Consulting Walnut Creek, CA garyscho Publications and professional services: http://home.att.net/~garyscho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 Gary Schouborg wrote: > > > Gary Schouborg wrote: > >> > >> By San's dualistic, simulated non-dual account, we can say nothing > >> about > >> > > <<<<snipped>>> > > > > ***** GARY!!!! Don't make me come over there!! :-) > > > > Judi > > > I can't tell if that's a threat or an offer. > > Gary ************* a threat of an offer. :-) Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 Dan, > > You thought you couldn't > say that? > > But you just did! > > Did you surprise yourself? > > -- Dan > You're not listening, Dan, which is a requirement for being profound rather than merely knocking off glib imitations of the rhetoric of enlightenment. I knew I could say what I did, but I noted that according to San's account of realization doing so is impossible. Therefore, San's account is false. Gary > --- Gary Schouborg <garyscho wrote: >>> Trace >>> There is no such thing as partial realisation. >>> >>> San: >>> That's what Trace is saying. Partial realization >> is an oxymoron. >> >> By San's dualistic, simulated non-dual account, we >> can say nothing about >> realization including the following: >> >> Realization is partial >> Realization is not partial >> Realization is >> Realization is not >> We can say nothing about Realization >> >> Gary Schouborg >> Performance Consulting >> Walnut Creek, CA >> garyscho >> >> Publications and professional services: >> http://home.att.net/~garyscho >> >> > > > > > NEW from GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. > http://geocities./ps/info1 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 Alright, alright, alright! That's enough! :-) Actually Gary does live in my old neighborhood in Walnut Creek, California. >> I really love Walnut Creek.....specially eating at Lark Creek Inn, (great spoofed up meatloaf!) and well, the shopping. I never did spot the creek.....or, rather, the ditch where the creek should be. Is there one? <G> San Leandro (where I am) has a creek...no water as of yet. Trace ...........INFORMATION ABOUT THIS LIST.......... Email addresses: Post message: Realization Un: Realization- Our web address: http://www.realization.org By sending a message to this list, you are giving permission to have it reproduced as a letter on http://www.realization.org ................................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 4, 2001 Report Share Posted October 4, 2001 I agree....I think mania is as close as it gets to 'real' without being 'real'....sheesh even defining real vs unreal is a trick of the mind and taints the experience, giving that 'the boot'. Ramana rules Trace Trace There is no such thing as partial realisation. One could have spiritual 'highs' which seem like the real Mccoy, but I suspect what Ramana talks about realisation is the real thing. :-) Raghu Trace Thode wrote: > The term partial realization seems so oxymoronic to me......Partial > realization=partially pregnant.... > ...........INFORMATION ABOUT THIS LIST.......... Email addresses: Post message: Realization Un: Realization- Our web address: http://www.realization.org By sending a message to this list, you are giving permission to have it reproduced as a letter on http://www.realization.org ................................................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2001 Report Share Posted October 5, 2001 Hi Gary -- > You're not listening, Dan, which is a requirement > for being profound rather > than merely knocking off glib imitations of the > rhetoric of enlightenment. Thanks for sharing your requirements and expectations, Gary. > I > knew I could say what I did, but I noted that > according to San's account of > realization doing so is impossible. Therefore, San's > account is false. Or, therefore you missed something that San was saying. -- Dan NEW from GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities./ps/info1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2001 Report Share Posted October 5, 2001 Hi Gary, > > Rob: Incidentally, I suspect that the Upanishadic idea of realization (which I take > > to be exemplified by Ramana Maharshi) is different from the contemporary > > Buddhist idea. I suspect that the contemporary Buddhist idea is the Catherine > > Ingram idea. > > > Gary: Could you say more about that? I know very little about Buddhism so my musings on this topic would be even more worthless than usual. Rob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.