Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The quantum is not next to godliness

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Rob,

 

> There are so many good books about physics written for

> lay people by first-rank physicists that it seems best to

> go straight to the well in this case. Richard Feynmann

> wrote a very nice book on quantum mechanics for lay people

> called " Quantum Electrodynamics. " Einstein wrote at

> least two books for lay people, one on relativity and one

> on the whole history of physics.

 

David Bohm wouldn't agree with you. He thinks that physicists have made a

hash of interpreting the formal theory because of inconsistent use of their

informal terminology. He says that things have gotten so confused among

physicists that they generally approve of Bohr and disagree with Einstein

while thinking like Einstein and failing to follow Bohr's interpretation.

 

Bohm, David, and F. David Peat (1987), Science, Order, and Creativity. (New

York: Bantam Books).

 

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary,

 

When it comes to quantum mechanics, I'll

trust the guys who invented quantum mechanics.

 

Rob

 

 

-

" Gary Schouborg " <garyscho

" Realization " <Realization >

Friday, October 05, 2001 5:48 PM

The quantum is not next to godliness

 

 

> Rob,

>

> > There are so many good books about physics written for

> > lay people by first-rank physicists that it seems best to

> > go straight to the well in this case. Richard Feynmann

> > wrote a very nice book on quantum mechanics for lay people

> > called " Quantum Electrodynamics. " Einstein wrote at

> > least two books for lay people, one on relativity and one

> > on the whole history of physics.

>

> David Bohm wouldn't agree with you. He thinks that physicists have made a

> hash of interpreting the formal theory because of inconsistent use of their

> informal terminology. He says that things have gotten so confused among

> physicists that they generally approve of Bohr and disagree with Einstein

> while thinking like Einstein and failing to follow Bohr's interpretation.

>

> Bohm, David, and F. David Peat (1987), Science, Order, and Creativity. (New

> York: Bantam Books).

>

> Gary

>

>

>

> ..........INFORMATION ABOUT THIS LIST..........

>

> Email addresses:

> Post message: Realization

> Un: Realization-

> Our web address: http://www.realization.org

>

> By sending a message to this list, you are giving

> permission to have it reproduced as a letter on

> http://www.realization.org

> ................................................

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...