Guest guest Posted March 14, 2002 Report Share Posted March 14, 2002 Usually, realizing involves a subjective change of awareness, allowing something to be made real due to new comprehension. Whatever is made real by way of new comprehension, depends on the subjective awareness which is doing the comprehending. If this subjective comprehension is changed due to illness, trauma, or death -- the realization is lost. What then can be said about realization that transcends loss? Such realization doesn't depend on subjective awareness. And without subjective awareness, there is no object. Neither a gross object (such as a computer) nor a refined or subtle object (such as " love " ). We can say that such realization is not subject, not object. Once we affirm what it is, we supply subjectivity with an object. Having negated subjectivity and objectivity, what is left? There is no negator to be found, nor an outcome for a preceding process. There is no religion involved here, no teacher, nor teaching. But saying that there is no teacher or teaching is merely an idea held by a subjective awareness. To transcend that very subjectivity -- this is beyond explanation ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.