Guest guest Posted April 20, 2002 Report Share Posted April 20, 2002 Continued... Symbolically, this is called " knowing " , or " cognizing " , the One Divine Self. But in fact it is not possible to fix attention on the Divine Self. Your own Divine Nature, or Reality Itself, cannot become an object of attention. The actual process involves attention and re-cognition of this suffering, this contraction. Where suffering is thus " known " , what it prevents is suddenly, spontaneously enjoyed-not as the " object " of enjoyment, but as the enjoyment itself. Then, prior to effort, motivation, or attention, there is only the Divine Self, Reality, the Heart. Where there is this re-cognition of suffering, the whole structure of experiences, concepts, searches, strategies, that is your ordinary life, your search, ceases to be obsessive or even particularly interesting. It loses its significance, its ability to qualify what always already is. This undistracted state, this natural enjoyment prior to the activity that is your suffering, is called " realization " , " jnana " , " understanding " . It is the enjoyment of Reality, that is Reality, what is otherwise symbolized as God, Masters, whatever. From the " point of view " of the Divine Self, the storybook " Masters " are of no more significance than a hamburger at McDonalds. The " Masters " are only more imagery that tends to fascinate and occupy the seeker, the one who is already suffering. But the search and the seeker are themselves of no real concern. They are already secondary, because the " seeker " is only a reaction to his or her own suffering. The prior action, the thing that is really occupying and motivating every human being, is suffering itself. Therefore, suffering is the appropriate and spontaneous subject of meditation, rather than the artifices to which seekers attach themselves. The seeker's illusions are not the appropriate subject. They are no solution. They are more of the same. This room is of no concern to somebody who has never even been to the United States. If a person lives in Germany, but reads a lot of books about this Ashram, his or her reading does not " create " an actual involvement with this place. It is not the equivalent of being here. It may be playful, humorous, enjoyable, but it is not itself equivalent to being here. Reading about Jesus and wanting to be like Jesus is not the equivalent of being Jesus. It never will be the equivalent of being Jesus. Your talk about " Jesus " is like your statement that you are in your body. You are suggesting Jesus to yourself, but in fact Jesus is not here. If there is love here, why does it have to be Jesus? What is added to this moment by thinking that the love that is here is Jesus' love? Why does it have to be Jesus? Maybe it is Sam Smith, whom nobody ever heard of! Why does it have to be Jesus? It is only because the mind is associated with that symbol, and it consoles itself with that symbol. Rather than penetrate your own suffering, rather than penetrate the unloveliness, the unloving quality of your own lives, you console yourselves with the images of things you do not contain. When you understand that, when you see what you are doing, it really becomes impossible for you to turn yourself on with symbols. You can read about Jesus and think that love is his love, but sooner or later there is going to be a real need for love, a real dissatisfaction with no-love, a penetration of this whole plaster mind that doesn't really do the job. Then you will see that all of these consolations are forms of your own mind. They are entertainments, distractions, for a purpose that is always hidden. Then you will begin to observe this motivation, this need to be consoled. And that is a very difficult affair, because in this process of re-cognition there are no consoling images. There is nothing by which to be consoled. There is a " death " declared in all the traditions. There is a " spiritual death " , a dark night, the death of the ego and all the imagery it uses to support itself, to console itself, to occupy itself. But consolation is the ego. The thing Jesus recommended was re-birth, or realization through spiritual death, the cross. " Pick it up and follow me, suffer the world. " He didn't recommend that you think about his aquiline profile every day and feel good until he comes again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.