Guest guest Posted September 18, 2002 Report Share Posted September 18, 2002 Duveyoung3 Thank you for allowing God to flow his truth through you to me. For me it has been an intuitive cognitive process of self awareness...... I am Grateful to all God's saints who appear in my path. Namaste !............ Jerrio ............................ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2002 Report Share Posted September 18, 2002 The discussion here about techniques " triggered me " into typing up the below. Hopefully it resonates, but writing it up was a nice technique for me—in that my personality gets that little bit more saturated with Advaita concepts, and I count this as a profit of some small consequence. The concept of a technique, as Ramana Maharishi and Nisargadatta Maharaj have relentlessly pointed out, is a prime dynamic of experiencing space/time. You feel (with intense conviction) that there's some " where " to go, and it just might be better than " here, " and it'll take some " time " to cross the " space " to " there. " Once the ego " turns on " the personality, losing its innocence, is thereafter whipped into a frenzied addiction to " going, doing, processing, etc. " Underneath it all is the fear of " being separate " which ironically the ego then uses as a bogus claim to fame. This fear is only " not present " when it is " balanced " when amness without an object prevails, when no " experiences are happening in the mind. " When the mind has no content, paradoxically, there remains the one single, primal experience, of being. This is an experience " in name only, " because the seer-seeing-seen triad, though inactive during amness (samadhi,) still is in duality because of an egoic individuality's potential to manifest is still there in the form of " seeds of desire. " The mind, upon emerging from the state of pure being, comes up with descriptions AFTER the experience…such as, silence, eternal, timeless, bliss, etc. But these descriptions were not present DURING the experience of amness. Amness is an all-time reality, so it cannot be sought just as glasses on your forehead are not lost when you seek them. Experiencing pure being is, however, the " ultimate " therapy. " Ultimate " herein means that which the in-time, in-space, ego defines to be perfection. And " therapy " in that " unenlightened aspects of personality " are made more tenuous, less substantial, and to have less impact by NOT ADDICTIVELY manifesting them for at least the duration of the experience of pure being. Pure being is a status of the mind that is described as " not manifesting qualities to give the mind's thinker function something to play with, " and pure being can therapeutically burn up any seeds of future " incarnations, " future desires. Pure being is the source of all qualities; therefore, any desire is fulfilled by it; and a fulfilled desire is a burnt seed. However, the ego's potential to manifest is not burned up by pure being, because " pure being " is identical to the quiescent ego and fire does not burn fire. The primal ego, the first act of separation from the Absolute, can only be burnt up by something transcendental to it, the Absolute. All other thought experiences of the mind come only AFTER the ego's existence and are said to " come out of the ego. " But when the ego is resting in perfect clarity without any objectivity to obscure its status as the core manifestation that symbolizes the Absolute, then the ego, in its purest status, is God, and though God can " un-do " any " sinful psychological patterns, " He cannot " take Himself and toss Himself into the Absolute. " No, as Brahma discovered, only COMPLETE ANNILATION OF IDENTITY will allow for the final wisps of relativity to become seamlessly pristine. No escape door is found to lead out of the lotus stalk. Only by denying the existence of the would-be-escapee does the eternal self get seen as the ONLY self of all. When the ego is in the state of amness it becomes a symbol of one's ultimate status: the Absolute; it symbolizes a witness with No-Thing in view (here the word " witness " symbolizes the Absolute.) Even having a single thought or feeling of pure being mars this symbol and any such experience is immediate proof that the ego has abandoned pure being and has entered a " field " of the manifestation of desires. In this duality, the impurity of " being-things " now becomes the primal sin in that one is " being-something instead of being- everything. " Even though these thoughts/feelings are " noise " in the nervous system, such thoughts/feelings are acceptable as symbols of the silence of being—just as black ink can be used to draw a portrait of an angel, so also can symbols be made of blood-burbles, acetylcholinesterase releasing, serotonin inhibition, etc. when these chemical interactions create the thought processes. Only the ego reposing in being (the ego is then the Cosmic Ego of God) is a fit symbol of the Absolute; when in repose it is THE perfect symbol of the Absolute, and any other thought or feeling experiences must be considered secondarily symbolic. Yet, pure being, amness, Universal Consciousness, soul of God, etc. reference (symbolize) merely the idea, the concept, that silence is the ultimate source of all creativity. Here's the technique the Brahma used to " get enlightened. " From amness sprung Brahma fully formed upon a lotus blossom. He immediately recognized that He was not the ultimate. He began His search for meaning by descending the lotus stalk—to find its source which was the Absolute symbolized as a sleeping Narayana (Vishnu) from whose navel the lotus' stalk emerged. After many of His years (human years being millions of times shorter than Brahma's years,) He QUIT SEEKING. Yep, He quit. Why? He recognized that even He, the Creator, could not invent a clever enough doingness that could traverse the gap between manifestation (Himself as a seeker) and the Absolute. He discovered that " Doingness " (which means any form of thinkingness, feelingness, anythingness that could be devised,) could NOT take that which He-as-a-seeker surmised was His " self, " (His ego assuming doership) and deliver " it " " into " " the " " Absolute. " Clearly, here we see God failing. Here we see God showing that no technique can be devised to turn the relative into the Absolute. No act of the pen of Charles Shultz could ever grant life to Charlie Brown. " And no system of axioms can yield all truths " —Kurt Godel. God couldn't get to His own source. God's mind, founded upon a perfect, divine, nervous system, couldn't grasp sentience itself. And if that wasn't bad enough, Brahma knew His destiny was to create, and He couldn't create! Yes kiddies, failed, read your scriptures; after failing to " find His Self " with a seeking technique, He failed again. Brahma tried to create the universe, and NOTHING HAPPENED. Here was God failing to create. Finally, the thought came to Him: " Ta Pa. " Do an austerity. Do tapas. And what would God consider to be a big tapas? It was giving up the idea that He was God—a separate being, a second source of sentience, a doer, a thinker, a spirit, a soul, an anything. He surrendered His identity (by meditating for 100 of his years,) and voila, He was " whooshed " into the presence of Krishna in His Heaven, called, Vaikuntha. " There " Krishna praised Brahma for his great austerity and gave to Brahma the power of illusion, Maya, by which He could at last create the universe with His almost infinite palette of qualities, values, concepts with which He paints the vast story of time. The metaphor is quite direct: 1. Do something (a technique) and you fail; 2. Do nothing, and you succeed ( " doing nothing " can look like directing one's mind onto the ego—this is a form of direct inquiry which, like a thorn being used to remove a thorn, is an " intending " to achieve disidentification with manifestation that, though illusory, is scripturally promised to be synchronistically associated with Grace (the self) which is the actual doer of all doings.) 3. Avoid involving your SELF with no-thingness, and 4. THEN God's Grace (Krishna's attention on you) is seen, as it always has been, to be pouring into your life when you realize that ALL THIS is instant by instant created spontaneously out of the Absolute with not the slightest hint of separation, not the least besmirching of unity. A status of perfection is discovered to always have been " there " supporting even the most insignificant aspects of creation. Every thought, feeling, sensation, desire, memory, drive, dream, is God's creativity flowing, exploring, displaying. ALL QUALITIES, all, all, all are manifested by illusion and seen/grasped/presented as a Great Drama that will eventually portray EVERY QUALITY's fullest presence in the drama. 5. And, like all great writers, God will not be satisfied with telling a story that has only peace, happiness, goodness, light, love and all the other " life supporting " qualities. He's telling the grittiest tale of all time and is using every color. So, looking for your ego is always a failure, but this looking eventually " proves " to " your small self " that sentience--that which is aware--is not findable, not perceivable by the senses, not conceptually encompassed by the intellect, and never fully hugged by a relative heart. At some point, the ego " gets it " that nothing is needed from it. All doing is done by the gunas, and the ego's role is just to be a symbol of infinite creativity. This " getting it " is the act of Grace from within and from without. Nothing has been earned, nothing has been achieved, nothing as been arrived at. Finding your glasses on your forehead is not a real " finding. " All that's been done is to recognize that no seeking is required because nothing is lost. When you see that ALL THIS is one piece, one concept that proceeds from the core dynamic of amness, then your individuality " dies " in that everything it has ever imagined desiring has been fulfilled, and there's just no need for duality any more. The individuality suddenly transforms into a " point of view " among endless other viewpoints….none being any more valid than the others….and certainly not something to identify with. So, look at the ego, ask, " Who am I?, " attend to silence, seek a diet that results in a quieter nervous system, saturate yourself with all the concepts of Advaita, hang out with like minded, and do everything else you can to discover that format of " the work " that best suits your personality/lifestyle. The state of least excitation is where it's not at, but it's the proper place to look first for that which is not missing—your self is always on your forehead; the Absolute is eternal and present in all states of consciousness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.