dear Dan

[Guest guest]

dear Dan,

 

I admire your writings; you made it

in to an art form to explain, that

yes means no and no means yes, and

both mean nothing, but they are

everything, in a neverending circle

and you are wise and objective,

except when Judi is in the picture:

I think this is because you are a

friend of hers and you see her through

rose-colored glasses.

 

It is great, that you and her can

help others to undermine their

ego-system when it is called for and

point toward the importance of

vichara, but it seems un-ethical for

me, that you help her trolling the

clubs and try to valdate her even

when it is clear, that she made a

mistake and is wrong in her judgement

eg about Papaji.

 

Pease re-examine, and look again

carefully of what you are doing.

Your title, a PhD suggest, that you

are an educated man and your posts

show great knowledge of psychiatry;

so you must know, that no one, No

One can market a nervous breakdown

as a technique.

 

You also must know, that Judi's

thinking: I can't find a better

word than: is mutated and she is a

victim of her own faulty rhetoric.

 

Please stay *Aware* and please don't

violate your integrity.

 

peace-awareness, Karta honeybee