Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Who Is Ganga Karmokar?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

 

 

 

 

I'll be on the sofa having myself a scotch.

 

 

Judi

 

Too bad Judi that you did not want to continue to do the work so that you would be in a permanent state of BLISS and not have to rely on chemicals to give you happiness.

 

Love,

Ramana Maharshi

 

********* Yes, poor dear, she's a lost "cause".

 

Judi

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Realization , " Judi Rhodes " <judirhodes@z...>

wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > -

> > Judi Rhodes

> > Realization

> > Saturday, April 19, 2003 9:47 PM

> > Re: Re: Who Is Ganga Karmokar?

> >

> >

> > Hi Tony, yes I understand, having a " good time " playing with

> Ganga or whoever and continually looking at your shit is one

thing,

> but " waking the hell up " , is completly and totally unrelated to

all

> of that.

> >

> > As Wayne puts it -

> >

> > " You " indulge " in self improvement

> > But all you have to show for it

> > Is an improved self. "

> >

> > And THAT is the game Ganga plays. The " self " improvement

game.

> The " getting " something game.

> >

> > And for those of us that are not playing THAT game, she

thinks

> our heads are up are asses.

> >

> > Obviously, she doesn't understand where some of us are coming

> from and she RAILS against us.

> >

> > Judi

> >

> > ********** And for whatever it's worth to you Tony, know that

> some of us are laughing at you guys behind your back.

> >

> > Judi

>

>

> **** T: Hi Judi,

>

> I wish I could convey the misunderstandings and misconceptions

that

> you appear you have about what is exactly happening in the

guru/chela

> relationship, because it is altogether different than the

assumptions

> you are making.

>

> I understand how if one has not had such a relationship, or if

one

> only hears the description alone, that one could make the mistake

of

> thinking that one would only be locked in some kind of dependent

> relationship, which engages one in a self-conscious endeavor of

> psychological becoming, and which only ends up solidifying " the

me " ,

> ... But in fact this it is actually not the case at all.

>

> The real " progress " is not more dependency or more self-conscious

> building up of the ego, and a polishing of this sense of an

> egotistical self through the " game " of " self-improvement " . It is

not

> the sense that I am becoming more or better, or more spiritual,

or

> even that I am getting out of my suffering.

>

> Neither it the sense of " me " having a " good time " playing so-

> called " spiritual games " getting stroked for the illusion doing

good.

> In fact there is not even the sense that " I " have " understood "

> something, and that now I have evolved.

>

> There are only moments of direct perception in which no inward

entity

> is there inside evaluating - trying to become something, or

trying to

> get out of suffering, or even making judgments of any kind -

that's

> all - simple.

> ... And it happens spontaneously, via ways and means, and

> intellectual understanding is not enough! I think that this is

the

> value of meditation, or of ritual, or self-inquiry, etc.

>

> I think it is a melting away of this solidified sense of the

> egotistical self, with all the many problems, which are

constantly

> being held in place by the suffering that is caused by its

> psychological struggles.

> ... It is not a self-conscious movement.

>

> I know you think you are on a different page than I am, and you

may

> well be, but that doesn't necessarily mean that only you

understand,

> and that I do not, or that you are superior and I am inferior.

>

> I think being on different pages implies a separation, which is

> caused by different egotistical mind-sets,

> ... But in direct perception there is direct contact and

communion,

> without all these egotistical barriers.

>

> And those who would laugh at me behind my back are not my

concern. I

> am not trying to maintain some favorable image of myself for

anyone.

> I am only trying to share with you.

>

> With love and affection,

> >

> ********** That's cool Tony, I appreciate your sharing. But like

I said, I'm coming from a completely different place that doesn't

involve any of that. You could say it's a total leap in

understanding. It's like water and oil, they don't mix together. The

whole dynamic is completely different. And of course I don't expect

you to see that. And more importantly, it's not necessary that you

do. And this " position " , if you will, is not something to be envied

or sought after. Like I said, it's out of that dynamic. There is

nothing " gained " from it.

>

> Judi

 

**** T: Yes, NO " peersonal gain " !

 

I think it is just the " loss " of this illusion of being a " one " who

is better or worse or higher or lower - of a " someone " who THINKS

they know or understand, or doesn't know or understand, something

which a " someone " else does or does not know or understand,

.... Because " it " is not a comparative value.

 

I think this is the illusion caused by self-identified separation.

 

However, the immediate and spontaneous realization of this is not

necessarily negated through a " valid process " , which actually empties

all egotistical accumulations, because otherwise one just stays

caught, feeling trapped, thinking there is no way out and nothing

that can be done.

.... Not true!

 

We remain separated and trapped as long as we are holding on to our

self identified specialness, whether it be the specialness caused by

the loop of our individualized self-pity and suffering, or the loop

of our unique " spiritual " attainment - both are caught and neither

are " out of that dynamic " .

 

One cannot deny the facts without living in illusion.

 

With love and affection,

Tony

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'll be on the sofa having myself a scotch.

 

 

Judi

 

Too bad Judi that you did not want to continue to do the work so that you would be in a permanent state of BLISS and not have to rely on chemicals to give you happiness.

 

Love,

Ramana Maharshi

 

********* Yes, poor dear, she's a lost "cause".

Judi

 

Funny, I thought you were just an "effect". If not certainly affected. ROFL

 

Maharshi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

**** T: Yes, NO "peersonal gain"! I think it is just the "loss" of this illusion of being a "one" who is better or worse or higher or lower - of a "someone" who THINKS they know or understand, or doesn't know or understand, something which a "someone" else does or does not know or understand, ... Because "it" is not a comparative value. I think this is the illusion caused by self-identified separation.However, the immediate and spontaneous realization of this is not necessarily negated through a "valid process", which actually empties all egotistical accumulations, because otherwise one just stays caught, feeling trapped, thinking there is no way out and nothing that can be done.... Not true!We remain separated and trapped as long as we are holding on to our self identified specialness, whether it be the specialness caused by the loop of our individualized self-pity and suffering, or the loop of our unique "spiritual" attainment - both are caught and neither are "out of that dynamic".One cannot deny the facts without living in illusion.With love and affection,

******** "Holding" or "not holding" is the self same activity Tony. It's all but the "suffering" business of "being" somebody.

 

There is no escape of it, it's not a matter of finally getting untrapped. It's impossible! It's an oxymoron.

 

You don't finally get the carrot at the end. What carrot? Do you see what I mean?

 

You're constantly creating your own carrot my friend.

 

Tony is a carroting, Tony is a carroting, Tony is a carroting, la, la, la, la, la. :-)

 

A little Easter song there for you. :-)

 

Judi

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...