the ghost of One / Judi

[Guest guest]

Realization , " Judi Rhodes " <judirhodes@z...>

wrote:

>

>

> Realization , " Judi Rhodes "

> <judirhodes@z...> wrote:

>

> What remains unanswered is just as telling as what has been

> said. I know this is a long winding post but it contains what

> dialog there was and the copouts that remain. There are two

> other posts that of course Judi dropped out of the dialog being

> that it entailed actually giving an answer rather than simply

> pointing a finger and saying how deluded someone else is.

>

> This is what is the most telling. I have never seen her say what

> she actually has gotten?

>

> ********* I told you already, nothing. Sheesh, don't you have

ears? How many times do I have to tell you, I got nothing!

>

> If I " had " something like Ganga does (sic), I'd be out selling

it. :-)

>

> Sheesh!

>

> Judi

 

 

Well-said, Judi.

 

That's it, isn't it?

 

They want to get something, claim something,

have a new, improved trip -- and so

it goes on, now in the new, subtle

spiritual version.

 

It's like the nondual, spiritualized version of

" I've got mine, Jack, and I'm okay. "

 

Any suggestion that what they got, and where

they're being taken is la-la land, and

all the lashing out starts to happen.

 

That's the part that's always noticeable.

 

Where all the " we are one, all is peace, happily

I meditate in blissful vibrations " suddenly

turns into " here's what's wrong with you, and

here's where you should be more humble, spiritual,

and nonegoic, like I am, and like my wonderful

guru is. "

 

And somehow, that's the last thing they'll ever look

into -- although they'll write volumes to tell

you how wrong you are, and where you're missing

the boat, and how blissfully one with everything

they are.

 

Some fun,

Dan

[Guest guest]

 

-

dan330033

Realization

Sunday, April 20, 2003 12:01 AM

Re: the ghost of One / Judi

 

Realization , "Judi Rhodes" <judirhodes@z...> wrote:> > > Realization , "Judi Rhodes" > <judirhodes@z...> wrote:> > What remains unanswered is just as telling as what has been > said. I know this is a long winding post but it contains what > dialog there was and the copouts that remain. There are two > other posts that of course Judi dropped out of the dialog being > that it entailed actually giving an answer rather than simply > pointing a finger and saying how deluded someone else is. > > This is what is the most telling. I have never seen her say what > she actually has gotten? > > ********* I told you already, nothing. Sheesh, don't you have ears? How many times do I have to tell you, I got nothing!> > If I "had" something like Ganga does (sic), I'd be out selling it. :-) > > Sheesh! > > JudiWell-said, Judi.That's it, isn't it?They want to get something, claim something, have a new, improved trip -- and so it goes on, now in the new, subtle spiritual version.It's like the nondual, spiritualized version of "I've got mine, Jack, and I'm okay."Any suggestion that what they got, and where they're being taken is la-la land, and all the lashing out starts to happen.That's the part that's always noticeable.Where all the "we are one, all is peace, happily I meditate in blissful vibrations" suddenly turns into "here's what's wrong with you, and here's where you should be more humble, spiritual, and nonegoic, like I am, and like my wonderful guru is."And somehow, that's the last thing they'll ever look into -- although they'll write volumes to tell you how wrong you are, and where you're missing the boat, and how blissfully one with everything they are.Some fun,Dan

 

******** I was talking to this fellow the other day and he told he asked Steven Harrison what the difference was between him and Gangaji, and Steven said, "heirarchy". :-)

 

Judi