Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

IQ

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

> Dear Tanya wrote in snip:

> I do have great intelligence though, my IQ's about 146 which puts me

> in the top 0.4% of the population so maybe that's why I understand

> her better -

>

> Ramana aka Alton:

> My IQ was recorded at 104 and somehow I understand Judi also, so

> maybe it has nothing to do with IQ.

 

My IQ was measured at 71, but thanks to hard

work and my parents' encouragement, I finished

high school and became the moderator of my very

own mail group!

 

-

" mark_twain11 " <unbound

<Realization >

Monday, April 21, 2003 2:00 PM

Re: the ghost of One / Rob

 

 

>

> Dear Tanya wrote in snip:

> I do have great intelligence though, my IQ's about 146 which puts me

> in the top 0.4% of the population so maybe that's why I understand

> her better -

>

> Ramana aka Alton:

> My IQ was recorded at 104 and somehow I understand Judi also, so

> maybe it has nothing to do with IQ.

>

> I understand her to be all she can be, which is nothing special.

>

> Love,

> Ramana

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Rob wrote:

My IQ was measured at 71, but thanks to hard

work and my parents' encouragement, I finished

high school and became the moderator of my very

own mail group!

 

Your joking?

 

Would you say that because of your low IQ that Self Realizaiton would

be more easily facilitated. If a persons IQ is low then surely they

will have an easier time giving up the ghost of the ego as the mind

will not be smart enough to be in a protection mode. If the aforesaid

it true then there is hope for me.

 

Love,

Ramana Maharshi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Your joking?

 

Yeah.

 

> Would you say that because of your low IQ that

> Self Realizaiton would be more easily facilitated. If

> a persons IQ is low then surely they will have an

> easier time giving up the ghost of the ego as the mind

> will not be smart enough to be in a protection mode.

> If the aforesaid it true then there is hope for me.

 

Dunno. If I had to guess, I'd guess that it's harder for

people with higher IQs.

 

Love,

 

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Realization , " Rob Sacks " <editor@r...> wrote:

> > Dear Tanya wrote in snip:

> > I do have great intelligence though, my IQ's about 146 which

puts me

> > in the top 0.4% of the population so maybe that's why I

understand

> > her better -

> >

> > Ramana aka Alton:

> > My IQ was recorded at 104 and somehow I understand Judi also, so

> > maybe it has nothing to do with IQ.

>

> My IQ was measured at 71, but thanks to hard

> work and my parents' encouragement, I finished

> high school and became the moderator of my very

> own mail group!

 

LOL!

 

God bless your parents.

 

As long as there are compassionate

parents such as these in the world,

will never lack for groups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Realization , " Rob Sacks " <editor@r...> wrote:

> > Your joking?

>

> Yeah.

>

> > Would you say that because of your low IQ that

> > Self Realizaiton would be more easily facilitated. If

> > a persons IQ is low then surely they will have an

> > easier time giving up the ghost of the ego as the mind

> > will not be smart enough to be in a protection mode.

> > If the aforesaid it true then there is hope for me.

>

> Dunno. If I had to guess, I'd guess that it's harder for

> people with higher IQs.

>

> Love,

>

> Rob

 

A high I.Q. can help, only insofar as it is used

to understanding the extent that conditioning

affects perception.

 

It is not the I.Q. itself, it is its use in the

direction of its own demise.

 

The death of the knower isn't an accomplishment,

so no I.Q. is involved in that.

 

But the readiness factor includes emotion and

intelligence showing that no escape can

be made, and that reality very likely

is not what is being construed as experience.

 

The death of the knower opens as the intelligence

that is the universe.

 

This living intelligence can't be measured,

so it can't be given an I.Q. -- it's

not situated anywhere where it can be

given a test. It's all pervasive

and never has a starting

point, so it can't be anyone's property.

 

-- Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...