Guest guest Posted April 26, 2003 Report Share Posted April 26, 2003 <I guess people specialize in different kinds of mind activity. My personal brand of confusion is words and scenarios.> Oh yes.....well, words don't bother me since I can't think in a complete sentence, but scenarios get me all the time. <I don't have the experience of questions and answers > in silence. I don't know how to ask a question > in silence. The mere intention to know something seems > like a thought. I do feel like knowledge is different from > thoughts. Maybe that's the same thing you're saying > and only the words we're choosing are different.> Yes, I agree. The intention of wanting to know is a thought and a distraction. Knowing is something before the invention of the question, the question coming sometime after the ability to think. Realization , " Rob Sacks " <editor@r...> wrote: > > > What do they think it is? What is the most common > > definition of beingness that you hear? > > I don't know. Do people try to define beingness? I > really don't know. > > > I was already a silent kid that hardly ever thought in > > words. But, I did think in motion and emotion > > and that's just as much of a block to what's right in > > front of a person. > > I guess people specialize in different kinds of mind > activity. My personal brand of confusion is > words and scenarios. > > > When a question is asked and none of that is rising > > up to get in the way, there's always an answer. > > I don't have the experience of questions and answers > in silence. I don't know how to ask a question > in silence. The mere intention to know something seems > like a thought. I do feel like knowledge is different from > thoughts. Maybe that's the same thing you're saying > and only the words we're choosing are different. > > > It might not give a chakra opening rush, > > but it will always leave a great crystal expanse of clear > > being, a mecurial sweetness of pure awareness that is > > all satisfying, no questions needed )...I thought that > > called for a smiley face :oD > > Oh yes, I'd definitely say so. > > - > " Onniko " <onniko> > <Realization > > Friday, April 25, 2003 1:49 PM > Re: Mark Twain > > > > <Yes it seems pretty obvious to me too. Yet some > > people think we are wearing rosy-colored glasses.> > > > > What do they think it is? What is the most common definition of > > beingness that you hear? > > > > <You were a lucky kid. But maybe the lucky thing is > > > that you asked. Maybe the answer comes easily to > > > children, if they think to ask. Maybe it's harder for > > > adults. They are too frozen in their " word games " etc.> > > > > Yes, I'm sure it's easier for kids. I was already a silent kid that > > hardly ever thought in words. But, I did think in motion and emotion > > and that's just as much of a block to what's right in front of a > > person. MOst people add the motion and emotion to the words they > > think of. Other people add the words to the motion and emotion. When > > a question is asked and none of that is rising up to get in the way, > > there's always an answer. It might not give a chakra opening rush, > > but it will always leave a great crystal expanse of clear being, a > > mecurial sweetness of pure awareness that is all satisfying, no > > questions needed )...I thought that called for a smiley face :oD > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.