Guest guest Posted January 18, 2001 Report Share Posted January 18, 2001 Hello Sandeep: " Subsequent to apperception (itself a conceptual occurrence in a conceptual phenomenality) who is then left to affirm anything about anything? " Sandeep. -------------------------------- Sometimes you are " very good " , Sandeep. But isn't it is " to affirm or deny " . El P.S. I may or may not post on here. Or much. That is, if I am even welcome. But I love it you guys put this list up. And I certainly am enjoying reading it. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2001 Report Share Posted January 18, 2001 Absolutely El, The whole issue of affirmation or denial, is no longer relevant. Cheers Sandeep - <maharaj8 <Nisargadatta > Friday, January 19, 2001 10:25 AM Sandeep: Re: Why Nisargadatta's teachings are pref > Hello Sandeep: > > > " Subsequent to apperception > (itself a conceptual occurrence > in a conceptual phenomenality) > > who is then left to affirm anything about > anything? " Sandeep. > -------------------------------- > Sometimes you are " very good " , Sandeep. > > But isn't it is " to affirm or deny " . > > El > > P.S. I may or may not post on here. Or much. > That is, if I am even welcome. > But I love it you guys put this list up. > And I certainly am enjoying reading it. > Thank you. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.