Guest guest Posted March 2, 2001 Report Share Posted March 2, 2001 12 THE PERSON IS NOT REALITY PG31 Q: Kindly tell us how you realized. M: I met my guru when I was 34 and realized by 37. Q: What happened? What was the change? M: Pleasure and pain lost their sway over me. I desire and fear. I found myself full, needing nothing. I saw that in the ocean of pure awareness, on the surface of the universal consciousness, the numberless waves of the phenomenal worlds arise and subside beginning- lessly and endlessly. As consciousness, they are all me. As events they are all mine there is a mysterious power that looks after them. That power is awareness, Self, life, God, whatever name you give it. It is the foundation, the ultimate support of all that is, just like gold is the basis for all gold jewelry. And it is so intimately ours! Abstract the name and shape from the jewelry and the gold becomes obvious. Be free of name and form and of the desires and fears they create, then what remains? Q: Nothingness. M: Yes, the void remains. But the void is full to the brim. It is the eternal potential as consciousness is the eternal actual. Q: By potential you mean the future? M: Past, present, and future – they are all there. And infinitely more. Q: But since the void is void, it is of little use to us. M: How can you say so? Without breach in continuity how can there be rebirth? Can there be renewal without death? Even the darkness of sleep is refreshing and rejuvenating. without death, we would have been bogged up for ever in eternal senility. Q: Is there no such thing as immortality? M: When life and death are seen as essential to each other, as two aspects of one being, that is immortality. To see the end in the beginning and beginning in the end is the intimation of eternity. Definitely, immortality is not continuity. Only the process of change continues. Nothing lasts. Q: Awareness lasts? M: Awareness is not of time. Time exists in consciousness only. Beyond consciousness where are time and space? Q: Within the field of your consciousness there is your body also. M: Of course. But the idea `my body', as different from other bodies, is not there. To me it is a `body', not `my body', `a mind', not `my mind'. The mind looks after the body all right, I need not interfere. What needs to be done is being done, in the normal and natural way. You may not be quite conscious of your physiological function, but when it comes to thoughts and feelings, desires and fears, you become acutely self-conscious. To me these too are largely unconscious. I find myself talking to people, or doing things quite correctly and appropriately, without being very much conscious of them. It looks as if I live my physical, waking life automatically, reacting spontaneously and accurately. Q: Does this spontaneous response come as a result of realization, or by training? M: Both. Devotion to your goal makes you live a clean and orderly life, given to search for truth and to helping people, and realization makes noble virtue easy and spontaneous, by removing for good the obstacles in the shape of desires and fears and wrong ideas. Q: Don't you have desires and fears any more? M: My destiny was to be born a simple man, a commoner, a humble tradesman, with little of formal education. My life was of the common kind, with common desires and fears. When, through my faith in my teacher and obedience to his words, I realized my true being, I left behind my human nature to look after itself, until its destiny is exhausted. Occasionally an old reaction, emotional or mental, happens in the mind, but it is at once notice and discarded. After all, as long as one is burdened with a person, one is exposed to its idiosyncrasies and habits. Q: Are you not afraid of death? M: I am dead already. Q: In what sense? M: I am double dead. Not only am I dead to my body, but to my mind too. Q: Well, you do not look dead at all. M: That's what you say! You seem to know my state better than I do! Q: Sorry. But I just do not understand. You say you are body-less and mindless, while I see you very much alive and articulate. M: A tremendously complex work is going on all the time in your brain and body, are you conscious of it? Not at all. Yet for an outsider all seems to be going on intelligently and purposefully. Why not admit that one's entire personal life may sink largely below the threshold of consciousness and yet proceed sanely and smoothly? Q: Is it normal? M: What is normal? Is your life – obsessed by desires and fears, full of strife and struggle, meaningless and joyless – normal? To be acutely conscious of your body is normal? To be torn by feelings, tortured by thoughts: is it normal? A healthy body, a healthy mind live largely unperceived by their owner only occasionally, through pain or suffering they call for attention and insight. Why not extend the same to the entire personal life? One can function rightly, responding well and fully to whatever happens, without having to bring it into the focus of awareness. When self-control becomes second nature, awareness shifts its focus to deeper levels of existence and action. Q: Don't you become a robot? M: What harm is there in making automatic, what is habitual and repetitive? It is automatic anyhow. But when it is also chaotic, it causes pain and suffering and calls for attention. The entire purpose of a clean and well-ordered life is to liberate man from the thralldom of chaos and the burden of sorrow. Q: You seem to be in favor of a computerized life. M: What is wrong with a life which is free from problems? Personality is merely reflection of the real. Why should not the reflection be true to the original as a matter of course, automatically? Need the person have any design of its own? The life of which it is an expression will guide it. Once you realize that the person is merely a shadow of the reality, but not reality itself, you cease to fret and worry. You agree to be guided from within and life becomes a journey into the unknown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2001 Report Share Posted March 2, 2001 Thanks for posting these dialogues. Much appreciation for the directness and poetry of expression. The passage below was noted here: >That power is awareness, Self, life, God, whatever name you give it. >It is the foundation, the ultimate support of all that is, just like >gold is the basis for all gold jewelry. And it is so intimately >ours! Abstract the name and shape from the jewelry and the gold >becomes obvious. Be free of name and form and of the desires and >fears they create, then what remains? > >Q: Nothingness. > >M: Yes, the void remains. But the void is full to the brim. It is the >eternal potential as consciousness is the eternal actual. The dialogue spins on. Yet if the questioner for one moment " got " what was said here -- what is there to question, whom is to be questioned, where is there to get with information received? If clarity is that no image " imposed " is retained, then only " awareness " , only " nothingness " remains. This eternal that never arose and never departs -- where does it have to get to, what does it have to gain, what information would it take in or process? Namaste, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.