Guest guest Posted March 2, 2001 Report Share Posted March 2, 2001 >This makes sense to me, which makes me think that Nisargadatta's >method of trying to sense the " inexperiencable One " prior to >experience is, perhaps, not the most efficient method. Might it not >be more efficient, and more graspable, to work on experiencing >oneself as being everything he or she experiences, rather than trying >to experience something that is nonexperiencable? > >dusty ~ One person's most efficient method is another one's sludge. The One is not experienceable, but it is recognizable.... though not by 'trying'. Xan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.