Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 Excerpt 3-31-81 Consciousness and the Absolute. Everything happens out of our own Self. This consciousness is spontaneously felt in the Self only. This, I, is not an individual. What is, is the Absolute unmanifested. What appears, as if in a dream, is the manifested, relative world. And this experience of the dream-like state, is the same, an identical state, for everyone. In this process of functioning, that becomes manifest, if you accept something as an individual event, then it affects you as an individual. If you do not take delivery as an individual, but as total functioning, then you are free of whatever is happening. The knowledge of the Self is this dream-like feeling of, I Amness. By assuming a separate identity, one taints that which is taintless; that is the original sin. Go to the very root: who are you, what are you? You are the product of the five elements, you have taken the support of the five elements. Your feeling of, I Amness, emanates from the five elements. Focus your attention at that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:51:21 -0000, you wrote: .... >By assuming a separate identity, >one taints that which is taintless; >that is the original sin. " I am " . The second lie: " It wasn't me! " . :-) Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 There is no (separable) one here to assume a separate identity. How can the concept of " sin " pertain to " origin " ? It's an oxymoron ;-) -Dan >By assuming a separate identity, >one taints that which is taintless; >that is the original sin. " I am " . The second lie: " It wasn't me! " . :-) Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:40:56 -0500, you wrote: >There is no (separable) one here to > assume a separate identity. > >How can the concept of " sin " > pertain to " origin " ? >It's an oxymoron ;-) Who asks such a silly question? And why are you calling me an ox-like moron? 'Origin' is like the snake eating itself. " It wasn't me! " (burp) ;-) Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 Hi Paul! >There is no (separable) one here to > assume a separate identity. > >How can the concept of " sin " > pertain to " origin " ? >It's an oxymoron ;-) Who asks such a silly question? The one who doesn't originate. And why are you calling me an ox-like moron? Because I'm looking in a mirror. 'Origin' is like the snake eating itself. " It wasn't me! " (burp) It burped and I appeared. Love, Burp! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 In a message dated 03/27/2001 1:44:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, misiunas writes: "I am". The second lie: "It wasn't me!". :-) Paul perfect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.