Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 Dear Dan, Namaste, thanks for 'clarifying'. :-) Love, Tim Nisargadatta, Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > Hi Tim -- > > When clarity is that the conditioning > and the entity are not-two, > there is nothing there to be deconditioned, > nor can there ever be anything separate > from " conditions " . > > So, nothing moves from a to be, from > having been conditioned to being > de-conditioned. > > The unconditioned that " all-ways " is, > neither is nor is not, > never was, never came into being, never will > come into being, nor go out of being > (or style). > > Blessed be, > as neither being nor not-being, > > Dan > > >Hi Dan, > > > >As seen from here, the conditioning and the entity are not two -- in > >fact it could be said they're the same thing. > > > >This makes 'deconditioning' possible... although not as a goal or > >ideal. > > > >Namaste, > > > >Tim > > > >Nisargadatta, Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > > > The attempt to end suffering > > > requires a conditioned > > > entity, a continuing being > > > moving from the past into > > > the future, and affected > > > by conditions > > > that negate self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.