Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 Continuing..... S: No, no.. S: Well that’s what he said in the book. R: I know. There's no emotion in the Jnani. There is no anger or happiness, human, unless he's putting on an act. Because the mind has been completely transcended. S: There are no bodies. R: There are no bodies? S: So he's acting. R: Apparently. S: He acted a lot. R: He sure did S: That couldn't be understood just as his samskara? I remember reading in Tripura Rahasya, they were talking about three types of Jnanis. One type completely destroys any kind of samskara. Another type, that hasn't occurred, and that he draws from that from time to time to appear to be human I suppose. R: Yes, I recall that. But that's only for an interpretation of a book. But you have to understand, in reality there's only one Jnani, not two or three or four. S: But I suppose the question really is then was Nisargadatta coming from the level of the mind or was he a Jnani. R: He was a Jnani. S: So regardless of all the things we hear about him, I mean I heard at one point he was really angry at this one woman because she was going to see another teacher and he was trying to throw the table at her and yelling at her, " Get out, get out, go and see him, don’t come back, " you know. S: Did he miss with the table? R: They do all those things. But it was all in fun. S: Many things in I AM That can be misleading. R: Yes they can. S: If you don't read it the right way. R: That's why I've told you many times, those books are dangerous to some people. S: Somebody said, an old teacher of mine, that Jesus never laughed. Is that true? R: He never laughed? S: I don't believe it. R: I wasn't there. I don't know. S: But if you're a Jnani, and Jesus was the same, the consciousness would be the same, would that permit... I've seen you laugh. R: No, see what you do. As you develop yourself, you have some of your personality left in your body. S: You have what? R: Some of your personality. That’s sort of human. That's still part of the illusion, that appears to be there. So when you see a Jnani reacting in a different way it has to do with their personality, which doesn't even exist. But it appears to exist for your sake. None of these quirks exist. But they appear to, for your sake. S: So from the onlooker actually the Jnani looks like anyone else. R: Yes, and they see in the Jnani what's in them. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ to be continued Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2001 Report Share Posted March 28, 2001 Roberts Adams is a joy to read, and to hear. Listening to his satsangs on tape, the Silence between the words is truly the message. Other's conception of what a Jnani should look like, and how they should act is understandable. The funny thing is that there are no rules in a game full of them. :-) Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.