Guest guest Posted April 4, 2001 Report Share Posted April 4, 2001 For those not too familiar with Neovedanta and Ramana Maharshi's teachings... Nisargadatta's " Brahman " or " I AM " corresponds to " Saguna Brahman, " and his " Parabrahman " to " Nirguna Brahman. " Shankara (orthodox Vedanta, ancient) didn't even bother with the distinction, but just said " Brahman " (no Saguna - with attributes, or Nirguna - without attributes). To him there was only one Brahman, for purposes of definition. The " Guna " part of Nirguna and Saguna corresponds to the three Gunas or " qualities " in Advaita Vedanta/Hinduism: Tamas (ignorance/sloth), Rajas (Activity/Motion) and Sattva (Purity/Holiness). If 'something' is without any attributes (Gunas) it is said to be " Nirguna. " If it has or reflects the three Gunas it is " Saguna. " Anyway, enough of this, maybe it cleared it up for someone :-). I won't even get into Buddhism and the " Samskaras " ;-) Namaste, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.