Guest guest Posted April 29, 2001 Report Share Posted April 29, 2001 Wim: I don't know if this relates to the particular statement below you are referring to: " He said that he doesn't agree with God at all. About what was he disagreeing with God? " BUT one thing is the spontaneous identity with the food body, he didn't agree with. Considering in Nature everything is food for everything else. As you will find out later, he said in effect, if he had know beforehand he was going to get into the food chain, he definitely would have turned the " birth " down. But in the original NO KNOWING state, he didn't know. El Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 29, 2001 Report Share Posted April 29, 2001 At 04:02 PM 4/29/01 -0000, you wrote: > > >Wim: > >I don't know if this relates to the particular statement >below you are referring to: > > " He said that he doesn't agree with God at all. About what was >he disagreeing >with God? " > > >BUT one thing is the spontaneous identity with the food body, he >didn't agree with. > >Considering in Nature everything is food for >everything else. > >As you will find out later, he said in effect, >if he had know beforehand he was going to get >into the food chain, he definitely would have >turned the " birth " down. > >But in the original NO KNOWING state, >he didn't know. > >El Hi El: Was this said as a joke or as a pointer to Truth? --Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.