Guest guest Posted January 29, 2001 Report Share Posted January 29, 2001 Hi El, As you, yourself have said, Maharaj spoke to people at different levels of consciouseness; depended on who was asking the question and what they needed to hear at the time. Last year at the beginning of a Net of Jewels egroup, there were posts about Ramesh being " the only Master " who spoke for " those who were ready to hear the final truth " ; " the ripe and mature student " . He is often referred to as a Sage (as you have also referred to him in posts on Net of Jewels) I am in resonance with you in regard to ... at a certain point in understanding, this all becomes resolved; none of this matters, but to come back to what you, yourself told Dan..... & since we are here, " keeping good company " is there not a place for discrimination without judgement ....discussion without smart assing? (not implying judgement on your part - just that this could be a very 'sticky' subject and I in no way want this to come across as judgemental ) All of the below and several posts from Peter in regard to Ramesh, as well as a comment made by Cathy after one of my previous postings is stimulating me to comment ( which i shall do in another post; here would make it too lengthy). ~jessica ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Dan: and even those are too positive. El: Yes, but they are a hell of a good start. Not everybody is where you are. and in another post to Hur: But as you move on up or in, these things will resolve themselves by themselves. And you will not be deceived by the various shadings and colors of the various hands Maharaj's teachings passed through. and then in response to Cathy's post you wrote: It Rings True HERE. So quite frankly my dear, don't give a damn where it came from. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - <cathywb snip> I would like to mention a couple of points here. snip> ... In the past I have confronted Balsekar about putting Wei Wu Wei's words (which I revere) in Maharaj's mouth. He did not deny this. Be very aware that Maharaj may not have said these things at all!!! snip> Cathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2001 Report Share Posted January 29, 2001 continuing... I think it's safe to assume that Maharaj represents for you (El), what Robert does for me, and many here regard Nisargadatta as their guru. Robert was realized at the age of 14, prior to meeting Ramana ( whom he spent two years with) Nisargadatta (spent 6 months with, when Ramesh was N's translator) and there were also other 'gurus' (other than jnanis) he spent time with as well. In a previous post to this group I shared a satsang with Robert, wherein he commented on Maharaj being quoted in I Am That, and saying, " that is not what he meant " and also that Nisargadatta was often angry ( got angry as part of the act for those(egos) who needed it) at Balsekar. He also regarded Nisargadatta a Jnani. Because Robert was a Jnani and spoke in my native tongue without a translator, his words carry more weight for me than words spoken by Tom, Dick or Harry. After listening to Robert being presented with questions in regard to various gurus, teachers and his comments in return - as well as including everything I mentioned in the previous post, including Peter's Whale's post to Sandeep: snip... Ramesh seems to hold the view that he has the ultimate understanding the same as Maharaj Nisargardatta. Would you hold this opinion? snip... and also one of Sandeep's posts about seeing Ramesh's stock portfolio on his (R's)desk... But if Ramesh has followed the path of jnana marga, as did Nisargadatta, Ramana and Robert, and if it is accurate that he has the same understanding as Nisargadatta, it would logically follow that Ramesh is a Sage; a Jnani. While for some, it may not matter whether Ramesh holds the view that he has the ultimate understanding - the same as Maharaj's, or whether or not he is a Master or Sage, to me it did matter because I wanted to know if I was listening to a Jnani or ajnani... and so for those, whom it matters as well, I will share with you what Robert had to say ... to be continued... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.