Guest guest Posted May 6, 2001 Report Share Posted May 6, 2001 Nisargadatta, " Omkara " <coresite@h...> wrote: > > Dan: > > " The observer is as much in transition as what is observed. " > > Nisargadatta: > > " All appearance and disappearance presupposes a change against some > changeless background. " > > On the level of thought, the two statements above appear as > opposites. From a perspective of clarity, these appear to be saying > the same thing! > > But what about for 'those' who aren't seeing from a perspective of > clarity? The question becomes " Who is right and who is wrong? " > > The answer is " Yes... 'who' is right *and* 'who' is wrong. " ;-). > > Namaste, > > Tim Dear Tim Your vivekshakti(discriminatory sense) is very sharp to point out the subtle difference between the two concepts. Let me add two more: (transition is the same as being - ring and gold-horse in a granite; being is the substratum on which transitions appear) and now transition is a dream of the being ; transition is the false appearance of snake on a rope. Which one is correct? Papaji's " The truth is " devotes many pages eleborating the sameness of the subtle variations in the language. It is like cutting through small lanes - I like your way which is the highway: right wrong rig ong ring just ring the differeneces away even better is: be die bee die Just smoke it away! Pranam Vijay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2001 Report Share Posted May 7, 2001 (snip) right wrong rig ong ring just ring the differeneces away even better is: be die bee die Just smoke it away! Pranam Vijay A smoke ring formed without exhaling? Smoking without inhaling? Peace, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.