Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 Hi Tim: You wrote, with much previous material snipped: Why does this all seem so 'distant' and conceptual? Synchronicity on the game board was lost several paragraphs back. This character feels that the poetry of Rumi and other such poets make better pointers than the above sort of philosophy -- they seem to echo his own 'apperceptions' more clearly. Reading what you said here, I am moved to respond: " Mad, mad Love beyond facts or being. Nothing is real here, but in your unreality I find fulfillment beyond truth. One falsehood from you is worth more than all the truths that Tim or Dan has ever spoken to me! " > Yes. That's one possible position to take > in the game. And the player " Dan " has > no reason to doubt the veracity of the player > " Tim " . The player " Dan " generally seems > to like the position of no position, > which can be changed to a position whenever > that happens, spontaneously. But that " Dan " > seems to like that, and plays that role, is simply another > player invented by the game playing itself .... " Synchronicity " partially regained in the above paragraph :-). The perception of synchronicity can be lost and regained. Synchronicity itself is omnipresent and total ;-) > Fascinating maya! It has lost much of its fascination here -- perhaps most of it. Yet that statement itself is fascinating maya! At least in Rumi-mode ;-) Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 Hi Dan, Nisargadatta, Daniel Berkow <berkowd@u...> wrote: > Reading what you said here, I am moved to respond: > > " Mad, mad Love beyond facts or being. > Nothing is real here, but in your unreality > I find fulfillment beyond truth. One falsehood from > you is worth more than all the truths that Tim > or Dan has ever spoken to me! " " Sort of " :-). There is a quality of 'transcendent light' that doesn't involve seeing, perceiving or thinking... and in whatever 'light' that may be, " the universe " appears as though a candle in the Sahari desert at high noon. " The world " in day to day perception appears dreamlike and 'distant' and " That Light " is in the foreground always. Whatever the quality of " That Light, " Love doesn't seem to be the correct term to describe 'it'. U.G. Krishnamurti uttered something like this: " Peace is volcanic... bubbling with energy. " > > " Synchronicity " partially regained in the above paragraph :-). > > The perception of synchronicity can be lost and regained. > Synchronicity itself is omnipresent and total ;-) True... i meant " synchronicity between Tim and Dan " :-). Of course, the entire portion " between Tim and Dan " is all one thing :-). > > > Fascinating maya! > > > >It has lost much of its fascination here -- perhaps most of it. > > Yet that statement itself is fascinating maya! Perhaps :-). maya is Parabrahman is maya ;-). Love, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.