Guest guest Posted June 14, 2001 Report Share Posted June 14, 2001 There is a quality of 'transcendent light' that doesn't involve seeing, perceiving or thinking... and in whatever 'light' that may be, " the universe " appears as though a candle in the Sahari desert at high noon. " The world " in day to day perception appears dreamlike and 'distant' and " That Light " is in the foreground always. Whatever the quality of " That Light, " Love doesn't seem to be the correct term to describe 'it'. Okay. Any description, either positive or negative, distorts *what* can't be a sense object or thought construct. But, if I don't look to your or my description to give it to me, then no description distorts 'what *is* and which never *is* as an object or construct.' (And yes, saying even that much distorts *it*.) U.G. Krishnamurti uttered something like this: " Peace is volcanic... bubbling with energy. " And then his skin started bubbling, and lava shot out of his mouth! > > " Synchronicity " partially regained in the above paragraph :-). > > The perception of synchronicity can be lost and regained. > Synchronicity itself is omnipresent and total ;-) True... i meant " synchronicity between Tim and Dan " :-). Of course, the entire portion " between Tim and Dan " is all one thing :-). Quite so! > > > Fascinating maya! > > > >It has lost much of its fascination here -- perhaps most of it. > > Yet that statement itself is fascinating maya! Perhaps :-). maya is Parabrahman is maya ;-). Yes! And so, *this* as is = peace with skin bubbling and lava overflowing Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.