Dan/Toasting Life

[Guest guest]

If you see Buddha on the road, kill him.If you see Nondual police on the road, kill them.If you see yourself killing things on the road, kill yourself.If you've killed yourself, the road, and everything on it --There's nothing to kill.So, in that case...L'Chaim ...A toast to life!Love,Dan

 

 

Yes, no need, no"thing" to kill,

though such "behaviour" is rampant

 

....clink :-)

 

Love

Skye

[Guest guest]

Hi Dan,

 

The flow of these conversations often become confusing to me, so

i've included our thread in full below.

 

We began with an inquiry into how thought (an inseparable part of

all that is) gives death meaning because of its limited

perception of images coming and going and changing of forms.

 

Then your train of thought moved to the idea that " If you've

killed yourself, the road, and everything on it --There's nothing

to kill "

 

I found this introduction - of the idea of a you that can be

killed after having just offered:

 

" Eternal life has no parts.

The idea of constituents

that break down and

change form is also

" human thought. "

 

- most confusing. Perhaps if you were to point out which part of

the dialog prompted it i would better understand.

Also your introduction of an " it " [killing?] sliding into the

past...constituents with nothing to do but repeat " is similarly

unclear to me here, in this ever new unrepeatable now moment.

Thanks.

Skye

 

 

The thread in full:

 

KKT: The body dies,

but the DNA remains :-))

 

Skye: But both the body and DNA are made of the same constituents

which just break down, change form and remain a part of eternal

life. Death means nothing to the body. Only human thought gives

meaning to death because it perceives form and not its

sub-stance. It ignores the fact that the electrical component of

thought is inseparable from life. Human thought sees comings and

goings, and imagines all sorts of impossible things.

 

Dan:

Quite true.

And ...

Eternal life has no parts.

The idea of constituents

that break down and

change form is also

" human thought. "

 

Skye: Yes

Eternal life is not related to any " thing " . It is exactly equal to

awareness choosing to be a human brain imagining isolated

constituents. Yet observing so, does not divide eternal life one

iota.

 

This unique ever new un-repeatable now moment is exactly equal to

" behaviour " breaking down, up, in or out. A process only

partially observed by human consciousness as solid isolated

constituents independently affected.

 

Language is so hobbling. One barely enters the freeway of

non-constitutional experience before being pulled up by the *One

Who?* police wanting their " ello ello *WHATS* goin' on 'ere "

politically correct verbals :-)))

 

Dan: If you see Buddha on the road,

kill him.

If you see Nondual police on the

road, kill them.

If you see yourself killing things

on the road, kill yourself.

If you've killed yourself, the road,

and everything on it --

There's nothing to kill.

 

So, in that case...

 

L'Chaim ...

 

A toast to life!

 

Skye: Yes, no need, no " thing " to kill,

though such " behaviour " is rampant

 

....clink :-)

 

Dan: Cheers!

Yes, it is rampant

" in the past " ...

 

Funny, how easy

it seems to slide

into the past ...

 

constituents. Then, there's nothing

to do but

repeat, repeat, repeat ...

 

Kill or be kill, what else

could it be about?

 

Or -- just ... " being " ,

and nothing to kill

or be killed ...

 

Life alone ...

 

Love,

Dan