Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 That's cool Paul... i didn't mean to go overboard with the whole thing... The only 'message' is this... " I am a (recovering) addict/alcoholic/gambler " boils down to simply " I am " ... which boils down to... (?) Remaining with simple " I Am " ... it really does 'work'. Nisargadatta didn't sit there talking to people for so many years because he got off on it :-). Peace, Tim Nisargadatta, " Paul Cote " <pjcote@l...> wrote: > ok Tim, Got it, Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2001 Report Share Posted June 18, 2001 Paul Cote wrote: > > Nisargadatta, " Omkara " <coresite@h...> wrote: > > Nisargadatta, " Paul Cote " <pjcote@l...> wrote: > > > > > well, I was just trying to describe a bottom, but not being cured > > > yet anyway.... ok, give me a prescription... > > > > > > how? > > > > Drop all " hows. " Drop all questions and the desire for answers and > > surrender. Admit that you know nothing, that life is utterly > > unmanageable, uncontrollable and unknown. Then remain there, don't > > move away. Stop moving away from things that make you > > uncomfortable. Stop moving toward things that give you pleasure. > > > > Be still. Just Be. > > > > There's your prescription -- whether or not you take it to the > > pharmacy, get the medicine and take it is entirely up to you. > > ok thanks! > > Paul > ****** There is a secret medicine Given only to those who Hurt so hard they can't hope. The hopers would feel slighted If they knew. ******* Rumi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2001 Report Share Posted June 20, 2001 In a message dated 06/19/2001 12:16:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time, coresite writes: The "one" to whom all those things happened went up in smoke, burned forever in the fire of Understanding. The "Tim" who once "existed" is a dim, vague and fading memory, a dream without substance. Namaste, Tim Hi Tim: Isnt a tim or elaine with no needs just new self concept? Love, elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2001 Report Share Posted June 20, 2001 Okeewap wrote: > > In a message dated 06/19/2001 12:16:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > coresite writes: > > The " one " to whom > all those things happened went up in smoke, burned forever > in the > fire of Understanding. The " Tim " who once " existed " is a > dim, vague > and fading memory, a dream without substance. > > Namaste, > > Tim > > Hi Tim: > > Isnt a tim or elaine with no needs just new self concept? > > Love, elaine > ****** Yes, but that's not what he's talking about. -- Happy Days, Judi http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/judi-1.htm TheEndOfTheRopeRanch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2001 Report Share Posted June 21, 2001 In a message dated 06/20/2001 9:06:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, judirhodes writes: Okeewap wrote: > > In a message dated 06/19/2001 12:16:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > coresite writes: > > The "one" to whom > all those things happened went up in smoke, burned forever > in the > fire of Understanding. The "Tim" who once "existed" is a > dim, vague > and fading memory, a dream without substance. > > Namaste, > > Tim > > Hi Tim: > > Isnt a tim or elaine with no needs just new self concept? > > Love, elaine > ****** Yes, but that's not what he's talking about. Well Yeaaahh. Have no idea how I did that. I guess I went back and pulled up the wrong email of tim's to respond to. Cuz this one sure makes no sense. LOL Love, elaine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2001 Report Share Posted June 21, 2001 Okeewap wrote: > > In a message dated 06/20/2001 9:06:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > judirhodes writes: > > Okeewap wrote: > > > > In a message dated 06/19/2001 12:16:43 PM Eastern Daylight > Time, > > coresite writes: > > > > The " one " to whom > > all those things happened went up in smoke, burned > forever > > in the > > fire of Understanding. The " Tim " who once " existed " > is a > > dim, vague > > and fading memory, a dream without substance. > > > > Namaste, > > > > Tim > > > > Hi Tim: > > > > Isnt a tim or elaine with no needs just new self concept? > > > > Love, elaine > > > ****** Yes, but that's not what he's talking about. > > Well Yeaaahh. Have no idea how I did that. I guess I went back and > pulled > up the wrong email of tim's to respond to. Cuz this one sure makes no > sense. > LOL > > Love, elaine > ***** Yes I know it doesn't make any sense to you, that's the point I was making. You're just trying to be cute. Wipe that phoney smile off your face you might actually learn a thing or two. -- Happy Days, Judi http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/judi-1.htm TheEndOfTheRopeRanch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2001 Report Share Posted June 21, 2001 Judi wrote: > > > > ***** Yes I know it doesn't make any sense to you, that's the point > I was making. You're just trying to be cute. Wipe that phoney smile > off > your > face you might actually learn a thing or two. > ****** In other words, when a person is mature enough, (humbled enough by their own sweat), to surrender all their " knowing " , then perhaps they're in a position for real understanding to occur, but not until. Up and until that point, a person is merely being full of themselves, " on top of it " only. -- Happy Days, Judi http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/judi-1.htm TheEndOfTheRopeRanch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 21, 2001 Report Share Posted June 21, 2001 > > > > ***** Yes I know it doesn't make any sense to you, that's the point > > I was making. You're just trying to be cute. Wipe that phoney smile > > off > > your > > face you might actually learn a thing or two. > > > ****** > In other words, when a person is mature enough, (humbled enough by > their > own > sweat), to surrender all their " knowing " , then perhaps they're in > a position for real understanding to occur, but not until. Up and > until > that point, a person is merely being full of themselves, " on top of > it " > only. > ***** Need I say more? :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.