Digest Number 331

[Guest guest]

Hello Gaudeamus: Perhaps an alteration of viewpoint

could be of assistance. Looking as an individual at

the words of the realized and especially all the

views, concepts and opinions of followers and seekers

can certainly be seen as garbage. But to whom are

Nisargadatta, Ramana, etc. speaking? Do they see that

which we take ourselves to be; or is it possible they

are speaking to that within us that they see? Can we;

by inquiry, by faith, by any method go beyond the

mind, the body, the ego, the doubts glimpse that which

they see? ........ john

--- Nisargadatta wrote:

>

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta, John Cox <jcoxco> wrote:

> Hello Gaudeamus: Perhaps an alteration of viewpoint

> could be of assistance. Looking as an individual at

> the words of the realized and especially all the

> views, concepts and opinions of followers and seekers

> can certainly be seen as garbage. But to whom are

> Nisargadatta, Ramana, etc. speaking? Do they see that

> which we take ourselves to be; or is it possible they

> are speaking to that within us that they see? Can we;

> by inquiry, by faith, by any method go beyond the

> mind, the body, the ego, the doubts glimpse that which

> they see? ........ john

 

 

 

Hi John,

 

Oh let there be no doubt Ramesh or Nisargadatta or X, Y, Z are

speaking to a seeker.

No seeker, no seeking, no concepts to be offerred.

 

That a concept is seen to be garbage, seen to be profound stuff,

profound enough to be propogated and kill or be killed in the

process, seen to be a mere thorn to pluck out another deeply

embedded thorn (and both thorns kept aside), all these nuances, part

of the Dance of Totality.

 

As-if.

 

 

Zip-A-Dee-Dah-Doo

 

Sandeep