Guest guest Posted February 14, 2002 Report Share Posted February 14, 2002 Nisargadatta, " gilles.vessiere.consultants " <gv.consultants@w...> wrote: > Hi, > > I think is similar the problem between classic physique and > quantique physique. Each one is true, but there no footbridge > between. Advaita seems true, dvaita seems also true, but the two > are not reconciled. I can understand the world is not actual, I can > understand the world is explosing from the absolute and throw > e " I am " , but why is it explosing like the > world we can see with its harmony and intelligence? Because 'you' are not separate from it, it necessarily appears to be harmonious and intelligent... It's like a fish asking why water carries the body of fishes so well, and why it's so good to breathe through the gills, and why it is just perfect to lay eggs in... what would the answer be? Cheers, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2002 Report Share Posted February 14, 2002 Perhaps the error is also in taking seriously the statement " the world is unreal. " This has been used as a sort of teaching tool, but to take it seriously as a belief... A hit on the head with a brick would probably cure that notion :-). And maybe even the belief " consciousness is all " -- if unconscious a while, where did consciousness go? <laugh>. Cheers, Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.