Guest guest Posted February 16, 2002 Report Share Posted February 16, 2002 Nisargadatta, " gilles.vessiere.consultants " <gv.consultants@w...> wrote: > Hi, > > I think is similar the problem between classic physique and quantique > physique. Each one is true, but there no footbridge between. Advaita seems > true, dvaita seems also true, but the two are not reconciled. I can > understand the world is not actual, I can understand the world is explosing > from the absolute and throw the " I am " , but why is it explosing like the > world we can see with its harmony and intelligence? > > Can you answer me? > > > Gilles In one of his poems Rumi compares philosophers to dice rolling on the backgammon board. Backgammon is a game of strategy based on chance and calculating the probabilities. In other words the mind is stuck on three dimensional reality trying to guess the probability of where things will be. This may be as hard as a monkey trying to figure calculus. In response to Quantum physics theories Einstein's reaction was, " God does not play dice! " As scientists look for the unifying theory to bridge the gap in their models, I like a simpler model inspired by Kant: $1 in your pocket is not the same as the imaginary $100. You don't need a scientist or a guru to tell you that. Just ask a cashier at the local supermarket. Hur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.