Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

(Nisagadatta) believing nothing - Dan

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hello Dan

You are quite right (you'll be glad to know) to challenge the statement "I have no belief", it obviously contains contradictions. In fact, it may be that any statement about "oneself" is contradictory. Presumably reflecting the illusory and limited nature of the "I".

Looking at it, I would say any expressed thought like this one, any "judgement as you describe it, is not intended to be set in concrete. It can be questioned, and yes, the basis of questioning can be questioned. Thoughts can be best regarded, perhaps, as pointers, not eternal verities. Certainly not something to be identified with!

To misquote W H Auden,

Certainty, ultimacy, on the stroke of midnight pass

Like vibrations of a bell

But it doesn't only happen at midnight!

Yes, it still seems there is nothing authoritarian, ultimate here. But things change. Perhaps I mean the same as your "coming and going", I'm not sure.

The existence of the ego can be tested out by observation, can it not? Every minute. Of course "ego" is only a word, used to represent a movement of thought, a tendency. I am not inferring any permanent entity.

What happened to the enquiry into creating worlds and universes? Or is that what we are doing here?

Clive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi Clive --

 

 

> You are quite right (you'll be glad to know) to challenge the

statement " I have no belief " , it obviously contains contradictions.

 

Contradictions don't bother me :-)

 

In fact, it may be that any statement about " oneself " is

contradictory. Presumably reflecting the illusory and limited nature

of the " I " .

 

Well, how would " I " know whether or not " I " am illusory ...

 

Thanks for the laugh! :-)

 

 

> Looking at it, I would say any expressed thought like this one,

any " judgement as you describe it, is not intended to be set in

concrete. It can be questioned, and yes, the basis of questioning can

be questioned. Thoughts can be best regarded, perhaps, as pointers,

not eternal verities. Certainly not something to be identified with!

 

Thoughts arise and depart in/of this " space " ...

 

Thoughts can't conceptualize nor give the

truth of this " space " -- yet it is all that is ...

 

> To misquote W H Auden,

>

> Certainty, ultimacy, on the stroke of midnight pass

>

> Like vibrations of a bell

>

> But it doesn't only happen at midnight!

>

> Yes, it still seems there is nothing authoritarian, ultimate here.

But things change. Perhaps I mean the same as your " coming and

going " , I'm not sure.

 

Comings and goings occurring in that which

has no coming nor going.

 

Thoughts and words about the ultimate come and go,

and of course will change over time, and

between cultures and individuals.

 

>

> The existence of the ego can be tested out by observation, can it

not?

 

Sorry, no, it's an inference and explanatory

variable -- not a measurable thing.

In other words, it's made up through the

activity of conceptualizing about measurable

things, and those measurements and things, of course,

are other concepts.

So ego is an attempt to explain the conceptualizing

of concepts, as if these were being done by

someone or something.

 

 

> Every minute. Of course " ego " is only a word, used to represent a

movement of thought, a tendency. I am not inferring any permanent

entity.

 

If there's no entity, then why label as if there

were an entity?

 

And, indeed, a tendency has no substance.

 

It's an inference, based on an assessment of a movement

and its presumed direction and repetition.

 

The label depends on the point of view of the labeller,

and the agenda of the labeller.

And is the labeller anything other than the activity

of making and continuing agendas?

 

So, indeed, we have a tendency trying to assess tendencies ...

Quite a fix! Until the tendency to want to know about

tendencies dissolves ... :-)

 

> What happened to the enquiry into creating worlds and universes? Or

is that what we are doing here?

 

No, that's not what I'm doing here.

You must be confusing me with someone else!

 

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...