I-I

[Guest guest]

Nietzsche I-I:

 

" ... when I analyse the event expressed

in the sentence ` I think´ I acquire a

series of rash assertions which are difficult, perhaps impossible, to prove=

-

 

for example, that it is `I´ which thinks,

that it has to be something at all which

thinks, that thinking is an activity and

operation of an entity thought of as a

cause, that an `I´ exists. "

 

Nietzsche

From Beyond Good and Evil 16

 

 

" In consciousness there can exist nothing

without it interrelated counterpart. The

moment you say knowledge, can only be in

ignorance, so this knowledge one has

about Guru is also ignorance. When will

the knowledge be Guru?

 

When that knowledge and the ignorance both

disappear into vijnana. Jana is knowledge,

ajnana is ignorance, both disappear into vijnana.

 

{principal of pure intelligence} "

 

Sri Nisargadatta

 

~all love Karta~

new club god-realizationSatsangandSanga

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " devianandi " <polansky@m...> wrote:

> ---

> >

> > Hey there, Noel:

> >

> > I don't know who the self-righteous, condescending character

> > " haokeaio " is, but, in order to approach Nisargadatta's teaching,

> just

> > do what he says in the book " I Am That " . Stay in the sense of " I

> am "

> > all the time. Eventually, it disappears and there's just " this " . It

> > really doesn't have anything to do with philosophy or thought

> patterns

> > or anything. It just is.

> >

> > fuzzie

>

> devi: when the I Am dissappears the I remains more commonly know as

> the Self..right fuzzy?

 

 

Nothing remains. There is no knower. It just is.

 

fuzzie