Guest guest Posted September 24, 2002 Report Share Posted September 24, 2002 Here's a post from Jan B. on the Nonduality Salon list, which he posted today on this very same subject. Wasn't it Jung who wrote about synchronicity? -- Dan NondualitySalon, " ecirada " <janb@a...> wrote: > And who is to proclaim Ramana is beyond " analyzing etc. " ? > That's the conclusion of devotees, and Jung wasn't one. > Ever heard of Patanjali sutras? > That could be called an ancient science of mind - analytic no problem. > Attachment to the " i am the body " idea shows in its negation: attachment > to " i am not the body " idea then displays as utter neglect with > predictable consequences. Jung also knew that it is very rare, a devotee > will " arrive " at his/her master's " realization " without a similar effort. > That requires optimism to begin with, and a lot of it..... > Unless, " equipped " with a scientific mind, knowing it's impending demise, > enabling to do it's " voided math " . > > Jan Nice, Jan. Insightful point. I'm going to post this on Nisargardatta list, where some discussion of Jung and Ramana occurred, assuming that's okay with you. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2002 Report Share Posted September 24, 2002 Wasn't it Jung who wrote about synchronicity? -- Dan He invented the term. -Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2002 Report Share Posted September 24, 2002 Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > > Wasn't it Jung who wrote about synchronicity? > > -- Dan > > He invented the term. > > -Bill So, that joke fell flat in other words? O.K. So ... Jung went to a scientist to have a replica of himself made, in case an accident should befall him. But the scientist said, " Let he who is without synchronicity cast the first clone. " -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2002 Report Share Posted September 24, 2002 Duh! dan330033 [dan330033] Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:08 PM Nisargadatta Re: Hur, why Jung didn't meet Ramana Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > > Wasn't it Jung who wrote about synchronicity? > > -- Dan > > He invented the term. > > -Bill So, that joke fell flat in other words? O.K. So ... Jung went to a scientist to have a replica of himself made, in case an accident should befall him. But the scientist said, " Let he who is without synchronicity cast the first clone. " -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.