Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

defining that

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Among the world's mystical traditions

Sufis call That Love

Defining Love is challenging

Hindus equate the universal Self with Consciousness

Buddhists named That emptiness

Modern nondualists call That " consciousness "

or simply the " I-am-thought "

defining consciousness is just as challenging as defining love

I heard Christians speak of the Divine Presence

In the Old Testament God said to Moses " I am who I am "

 

The awareness of being is love

 

Sweet love

does this sound like a sugarcoated model of reality

that can only come from the devotional minds?

 

If we didn't know any of the above spiritual traditions

and their concepts,

what do we really know?

 

Love is sweet but as long as consciousness is present

Once the body/mind dies, there is no more sweetness

This temporary state,

the " I-am-thought, "

this consciousness,

this awareness of being,

this Love

appeared and one day it will disappear.

 

I have no idea what or who remains after death

but by definition what remains is

" what has always been "

and whatever that may be,

That is here and now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, " Hur Guler " <hurg> wrote:

> Among the world's mystical traditions

> Sufis call That Love

> Defining Love is challenging

> Hindus equate the universal Self with Consciousness

> Buddhists named That emptiness

> Modern nondualists call That " consciousness "

> or simply the " I-am-thought "

> defining consciousness is just as challenging as defining love

> I heard Christians speak of the Divine Presence

> In the Old Testament God said to Moses " I am who I am "

>

> The awareness of being is love

>

> Sweet love

> does this sound like a sugarcoated model of reality

> that can only come from the devotional minds?

>

> If we didn't know any of the above spiritual traditions

> and their concepts,

> what do we really know?

>

> Love is sweet but as long as consciousness is present

> Once the body/mind dies, there is no more sweetness

> This temporary state,

> the " I-am-thought, "

> this consciousness,

> this awareness of being,

> this Love

> appeared and one day it will disappear.

>

> I have no idea what or who remains after death

> but by definition what remains is

> " what has always been "

> and whatever that may be,

> That is here and now

 

 

-------------------------------

 

What do we really know?

Hur

 

 

History.

El

 

 

..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, " Elizabeth G Wells " <elwells8@e...>

wrote:

> Nisargadatta, " Hur Guler " <hurg> wrote:

> > Among the world's mystical traditions

> > Sufis call That Love

> > Defining Love is challenging

> > Hindus equate the universal Self with Consciousness

> > Buddhists named That emptiness

> > Modern nondualists call That " consciousness "

> > or simply the " I-am-thought "

> > defining consciousness is just as challenging as defining

love

> > I heard Christians speak of the Divine Presence

> > In the Old Testament God said to Moses " I am who I am "

> >

> > The awareness of being is love

> >

> > Sweet love

> > does this sound like a sugarcoated model of reality

> > that can only come from the devotional minds?

> >

> > If we didn't know any of the above spiritual traditions

> > and their concepts,

> > what do we really know?

> >

> > Love is sweet but as long as consciousness is present

> > Once the body/mind dies, there is no more sweetness

> > This temporary state,

> > the " I-am-thought, "

> > this consciousness,

> > this awareness of being,

> > this Love

> > appeared and one day it will disappear.

> >

> > I have no idea what or who remains after death

> > but by definition what remains is

> > " what has always been "

> > and whatever that may be,

> > That is here and now

>

>

> -------------------------------

>

> What do we really know?

> Hur

>

>

> History.

> El

>

>

 

When I was handed my first history book....

 

I paged through this big thick musty thing,

handed it back to the teacher,

and said, " no thank you, I'm here now. "

 

Wack!

 

El

 

 

..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> what do we really know?

So forget *knowing*.

Rather ask, " What is? "

For me what arises in my heart

and fills me Is.

Now Is.

 

> Sweet love

> does this sound like a sugarcoated model of reality

> that can only come from the devotional minds?

But Sweet Love is not a model.

 

> Love is sweet but as long as consciousness is present

> Once the body/mind dies, there is no more sweetness

> This temporary state,

> the " I-am-thought, "

> this consciousness,

> this awareness of being,

> this Love

> appeared and one day it will disappear.

>

> I have no idea what or who remains after death

> but by definition what remains is

> " what has always been "

> and whatever that may be,

> That is here and now

Now itself is sweetness.

We check all ideas at the door

to enter Now.

 

 

-Bill

 

 

 

> Hur Guler [hurg]

>

> Among the world's mystical traditions

> Sufis call That Love

> Defining Love is challenging

> Hindus equate the universal Self with Consciousness

> Buddhists named That emptiness

> Modern nondualists call That " consciousness "

> or simply the " I-am-thought "

> defining consciousness is just as challenging as defining love

> I heard Christians speak of the Divine Presence

> In the Old Testament God said to Moses " I am who I am "

>

> The awareness of being is love

>

> Sweet love

> does this sound like a sugarcoated model of reality

> that can only come from the devotional minds?

>

> If we didn't know any of the above spiritual traditions

> and their concepts,

> what do we really know?

>

> Love is sweet but as long as consciousness is present

> Once the body/mind dies, there is no more sweetness

> This temporary state,

> the " I-am-thought, "

> this consciousness,

> this awareness of being,

> this Love

> appeared and one day it will disappear.

>

> I have no idea what or who remains after death

> but by definition what remains is

> " what has always been "

> and whatever that may be,

> That is here and now

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta, " Hur Guler " <hurg> wrote:

> If we didn't know any of the above spiritual traditions

> and their concepts,

> what do we really know?

>

 

 

I think we would know, specifically, that we are not anything seen, heard,

sensed, & cognized, but are the spotless " space " or " surface " in which these

occur, consisting of awareness, and that this awareness is also blissful. Beyond

that, the mind may conceive pet theories of it & philosophical systems, but this

central thing can't be denied.

 

There's a book I've been reading recently by R.C. Zaehner called " Hindu and

Muslim Mysticism " . It addresses these issues from a scholarly standpoint, but it

does give good doses of the various proponents themselves. It appears that there

is taught, among mystics, three identifiable definitions of liberation -

isolation, undifferentiated, & love-based (theistic). The second one is, I

think, the most truthful, for the first and third have either a negative or

positive view towards stimuli, which the Self doesn't have.

 

> Love is sweet but as long as consciousness is present

> Once the body/mind dies, there is no more sweetness

 

The body & mind are dependent wholly upon consciousness.

 

 

> This temporary state,

> the " I-am-thought, "

> this consciousness,

> this awareness of being,

> this Love

> appeared and one day it will disappear.

>

 

If it meets appearance and disappearance, it is not the True Self and is a

fabricated, conditioned thing - no sense in bothering with it until one comes to

the True Self.

 

> I have no idea what or who remains after death

> but by definition what remains is

> " what has always been "

> and whatever that may be,

> That is here and now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...