Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > My My Dan! > What disdain! > > Don't need no Dharma Cop. > He can die now. > What will be born > from the flash of his ash? How do you know that was disdain? You know that you interpreted it as disdain. Do you look into the interpretation you made, and where that came from and what it was about? Or do you jump to the idea that someone is functioning as a Dharma Cop? There is no Dharma Cop to die, there is only the transferrence known as " Bill " who dies as the reaction formations known as " Bill " cease to apply to this moment. Of course, " Dan " is to die the same death. It is always only the death of " conceptuality " , which of course, can't ever be expressed here -- hinted at, perhaps ... -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 Honesty, please, for God's sake! No disdain? ---- Anand --- dan330033 <dan330033 wrote: <HR> <html><body> <tt> Nisargadatta, & quot;Bill Rishel & quot; & lt;plexus@x & gt; wrote:<BR> & gt; My My Dan!<BR> & gt; What disdain!<BR> & gt; <BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Don't need no Dharma Cop.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; He can die now.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; What will be born<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; from the flash of his ash?<BR> <BR> How do you know that was disdain?<BR> <BR> You know that you interpreted it as disdain.<BR> <BR> Do you look into the interpretation you made,<BR> & nbsp; and where that came from and what it was<BR> & nbsp; about?<BR> <BR> Or do you jump to the idea that someone is<BR> & nbsp; functioning as a Dharma Cop?<BR> <BR> There is no Dharma Cop to die, there is<BR> & nbsp; only the transferrence known as & quot;Bill & quot;<BR> & nbsp; who dies as the reaction formations<BR> & nbsp; known as & quot;Bill & quot; cease to apply to<BR> & nbsp; this moment. & nbsp; Of course, & quot;Dan & quot; is<BR> & nbsp; to die the same death.<BR> <BR> It is always only the death of & quot;conceptuality & quot;,<BR> & nbsp; which of course, can't ever be expressed<BR> & nbsp; here -- hinted at, perhaps ...<BR> <BR> -- Dan<BR> <BR> </tt> <br> <!-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| --> <table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2> <tr bgcolor=#FFFFCC> <td align=center><font size= " -1 " color=#003399><b> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.