Guest guest Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 For those who doesn't understand Danish, what Dan is trying to say could be translated in one phrase: " This show has no actors, only action. " Of course, I could be wrong, I'm not fluent in Danish. So let this thread go to Dannation. ) Pete Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 The actor is the action, the action is the actor. They both drop. If I married Kate and took her name, I could be Dannish Moss. Of course, you could do the same and be Pete Moss. But I'll just eat a Danish and kick back instead, Dan Ish Nisargadatta, pete seesaw <seesaw1us> wrote: > For those who doesn't understand Danish, what Dan is > trying to say could be translated in one phrase: > " This show has no actors, only action. " Of course, > I could be wrong, I'm not fluent in Danish. So let > this thread go to Dannation. ) > > Pete > > > > > > Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site > http://webhosting./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 Nisargadatta, " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > The actor is the action, the action is the actor. > > They both drop. > > If I married Kate and took her name, > I could be Dannish Moss. > > Of course, you could do the same > and be Pete Moss. > > But I'll just eat a Danish and > kick back instead, > Dan Ish Dan, I think you should have let Pete translate your gobbily gook and quit while you were ahead. Eat Kate Moss instead - less filling!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2002 Report Share Posted October 21, 2002 > Dan, > I think you should have let Pete translate your gobbily gook and quit > while you were ahead. > > Eat Kate Moss instead - less filling!! Funny. Oh nameless one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Dan, you know I'm your # 1 fan. I just love to mess with you. I have to keep holding your string, you bloated helium balloon. Pete --- dan330033 <dan330033 wrote: > The actor is the action, the action is the actor. > > They both drop. > > If I married Kate and took her name, > I could be Dannish Moss. > > Of course, you could do the same > and be Pete Moss. > > But I'll just eat a Danish and > kick back instead, > Dan Ish > > Nisargadatta, pete seesaw > <seesaw1us> wrote: > > For those who doesn't understand Danish, what Dan > is > > trying to say could be translated in one phrase: > > " This show has no actors, only action. " Of course, > > I could be wrong, I'm not fluent in Danish. So let > > > this thread go to Dannation. ) > > > > Pete > > > > > > > > > > > > Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site > > http://webhosting./ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 > What Dan has written I have often found difficult and challenging to understand but when I've persevered I've always found it absolutely lucid, truthful and coherent. From here, what Dan writes seems very far removed from 'gobbily gook'. You seem to be joking in this post and I don't want to be a killjoy, but there also seems to me to be a seriousness there too. > > Grant. Yes, Grant, thanks. I'm used to no one following what I say. But all the same, it's nice to hear your kind words. And yes, there's something I'm hinting at, that there's a difference between saying drop the actor, there's only action -- and saying actor is action, action is actor, actor and action drop. The difference is the discontinuity here. At the point of discontinuity, there is no time, no space, no experience. It's similar to a black hole. Jesus said, " it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom. " Riches being anything at all brought forward, even the idea of moving forward, or of anything being moved into. Something opens up at this point of discontinuity, as all concept drops away of itself. That something isn't a something, of course, and it isn't anti-concepts whatsoever, merely not-of-concepts in any way. Namaste, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Nisargadatta, pete seesaw <seesaw1us> wrote: > Dan, you know I'm your # 1 fan. I just love to mess > with you. I have to keep holding your string, you > bloated helium balloon. > > Pete Pete, I can hear your voice. Pete, everything is okay. Move toward the light, move toward the light. :-) Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Hi Bill, > Dan, > I think you should have let Pete translate your gobbily gook and quit > while you were ahead. > > Eat Kate Moss instead - less filling!! What Dan has written I have often found difficult and challenging to understand but when I've persevered I've always found it absolutely lucid, truthful and coherent. From here, what Dan writes seems very far removed from 'gobbily gook'. You seem to be joking in this post and I don't want to be a killjoy, but there also seems to me to be a seriousness there too. Grant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 The light is everything, budd. Can the light move toward itself? Pete --- dan330033 <dan330033 wrote: > Nisargadatta, pete seesaw > <seesaw1us> wrote: > > Dan, you know I'm your # 1 fan. I just love to > mess > > with you. I have to keep holding your string, you > > bloated helium balloon. > > > > Pete > > Pete, I can hear your voice. > > Pete, everything is okay. > > Move toward the light, move toward the light. > > :-) > > Dan > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 > > That something isn't a something, of course, > and it isn't anti-concepts whatsoever, > merely not-of-concepts in any way. > > Namaste, > Dan sure that's what they all say! Hiya, Dan. yup, the greatest thing in the universe and shoot - no one there to enjoy it. heeheehee and no one there to not enjoy it either. still, 'tis loverly! discontinuity, eh? great turn of phrase there. that event, that moment when the last little speck of treasure drops. hoooie! muchachos y muchachas! - aiiiiiiiiie! nada - michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 No need to apologize, Bill was correct, that was me who wrote that. Just me throwing my peas 'cuz I can't understand Dan. -------------------------------- NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. -------------------------------- Uncle Larry > Sorry Bill! > > Grant. > > > > ** Original RE: Re: The Art to... > > ** Original Sender: " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x...> > > ** Original 21 Oct 2002 23:00:54 -0000 > > > ** Original Message follows... > > > > > Err, that wasn't me that wrote that, Grant. > > I believe that was trem. > > > > I enjoyed Dan's post, myself. > > > > Peace, > > Bill > > > > > > bardsley@c... [bardsley@c...] > > Monday, October 21, 2002 4:36 PM > > Nisargadatta > > re: Re: The Art to... > > > > > > Hi Bill, > > > > > Dan, > > > I think you should have let Pete translate your gobbily gook and quit > > > while you were ahead. > > > > > > Eat Kate Moss instead - less filling!! > > > > What Dan has written I have often found difficult and challenging to > > understand but when I've persevered I've always found it absolutely lucid, > > truthful and coherent. From here, what Dan writes seems very far removed > > from 'gobbily gook'. You seem to be joking in this post and I don't want to > > be a killjoy, but there also seems to me to be a seriousness there too. > > > > Grant. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 > NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. A masterstoke! OK, Dan, I can be at peace with this Inquiry thing now. Thank you Uncle, -Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Nisargadatta, pete seesaw <seesaw1us> wrote: > > The light is everything, budd. Can the light move > toward itself? > > Pete No, it can just get sucked into the darkness. Do you hear a loud sucking noise? -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Hiya Michael -- > and no one there to not enjoy it either. > still, 'tis loverly! What's not to love? > discontinuity, eh? great turn of phrase there. > that event, that moment when the last little speck of treasure drops. Plink! > hoooie! muchachos y muchachas! - aiiiiiiiiie! > > nada - michael Take care nadabody! -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Hi Larry -- Understanding can't understand itself. Understand? There's nothing to be understood in Dan. Is now closer than then? If so, then understanding has been made into something it's not -- something that can be touched and located. Peace, Dan Nisargadatta, " trem23 " <inmadison@h...> wrote: > No need to apologize, Bill was correct, that was me who wrote that. > Just me throwing my peas 'cuz I can't understand Dan. > -------------------------------- > NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. > -------------------------------- > > Uncle Larry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > > NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. > > A masterstoke! > > OK, Dan, I can be at peace with this > Inquiry thing now. > > Thank you Uncle, > -Bill Peace is good. Watch out for those masterstokers, they'll stoke ya every time! Smoking a stogie, Man of means by no means, King of the road Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Inquiring can't Inquire itself. Inquire? There's nothing to be Inquired... Every word is unword like birds flying behind the sun. Larry thinks he is getting the hang of this, now and then!!! with gratitude, Larry Nisargadatta, " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > Hi Larry -- > > Understanding can't understand itself. > > Understand? > > There's nothing to be understood in Dan. > > Is now closer than then? > > If so, then understanding has been > made into something it's not -- > something that can be touched > and located. > > Peace, > Dan > > Nisargadatta, " trem23 " <inmadison@h...> wrote: > > No need to apologize, Bill was correct, that was me who wrote that. > > Just me throwing my peas 'cuz I can't understand Dan. > > -------------------------------- > > NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. > > -------------------------------- > > > > Uncle Larry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Dan, I Roger THAT, Larry, the miller's son Nisargadatta, " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > > > NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. > > > > A masterstoke! > > > > OK, Dan, I can be at peace with this > > Inquiry thing now. > > > > Thank you Uncle, > > -Bill > > Peace is good. > > Watch out for those masterstokers, > they'll stoke ya every time! > > Smoking a stogie, > Man of means by no means, > King of the road Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Nisargadatta, " trem23 " <inmadison@h...> wrote: > Inquiring can't Inquire itself. True. > Inquire? > > There's nothing to be Inquired... .... about from a place in Dan. > Every word is unword like birds flying behind the sun. > Larry thinks he is getting the hang of this, now and then!!! Nice hangliding with ya. > with gratitude, > Larry and beatitude, Dan > > Nisargadatta, " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote: > > Hi Larry -- > > > > Understanding can't understand itself. > > > > Understand? > > > > There's nothing to be understood in Dan. > > > > Is now closer than then? > > > > If so, then understanding has been > > made into something it's not -- > > something that can be touched > > and located. > > > > Peace, > > Dan > > > > Nisargadatta, " trem23 " <inmadison@h...> wrote: > > > No need to apologize, Bill was correct, that was me who wrote > that. > > > Just me throwing my peas 'cuz I can't understand Dan. > > > -------------------------------- > > > NOW is the inquiry of Dharma. > > > -------------------------------- > > > > > > Uncle Larry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2002 Report Share Posted October 23, 2002 Light is everything that is. Darkness is what is not. What is not is immutable, what is, transient. Place your bet now, Budd, the roulette is spinning. No matter where you place your chips, darkness will be waiting. Pete --- dan330033 <dan330033 wrote: > Nisargadatta, pete seesaw > <seesaw1us> wrote: > > > > The light is everything, budd. Can the light move > > toward itself? > > > > Pete > > No, it can just get sucked into the darkness. > > Do you hear a loud sucking noise? > > -- Dan > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2002 Report Share Posted October 23, 2002 Nisargadatta, pete seesaw <seesaw1us> wrote: > Light is everything that is. Darkness is what is not. > What is not is immutable, what is, transient. Place > your bet now, Budd, the roulette is spinning. No > matter where you place your chips, darkness will be > waiting. > > Pete I place my bet on not being concerned about it. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2002 Report Share Posted October 23, 2002 Wise bet! On or off there is only one light-bulb. Pete --- dan330033 <dan330033 wrote: > Nisargadatta, pete seesaw > <seesaw1us> wrote: > > Light is everything that is. Darkness is what is > not. > > What is not is immutable, what is, transient. > Place > > your bet now, Budd, the roulette is spinning. No > > matter where you place your chips, darkness will > be > > waiting. > > > > Pete > > I place my bet on not being concerned about it. > > -- Dan > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2002 Report Share Posted October 24, 2002 I place my bet on you guys being in a stalemate. -Bill dan330033 [dan330033] Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:44 AM Nisargadatta Re: The Art to... Nisargadatta, pete seesaw <seesaw1us> wrote: > Light is everything that is. Darkness is what is not. > What is not is immutable, what is, transient. Place > your bet now, Budd, the roulette is spinning. No > matter where you place your chips, darkness will be > waiting. > > Pete I place my bet on not being concerned about it. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2002 Report Share Posted October 24, 2002 Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > I place my bet on you guys being in a stalemate. > > -Bill Do you really see two guys here? -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 24, 2002 Report Share Posted October 24, 2002 At least two. You, Pete.... Of course I don't actually " see " you and Pere, but I'm betting on you two actually existing. But then I'm also betting on you existing as I write this post. Does that make sense? Maybe I'm in over my head. The air seems thin. -Bill dan330033 [dan330033] Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:59 AM Nisargadatta Re: The Art to... Nisargadatta, " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > I place my bet on you guys being in a stalemate. > > -Bill Do you really see two guys here? -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.