Guest guest Posted April 18, 2003 Report Share Posted April 18, 2003 Shawn or Hur please elaborate on the space part: since I recall the " pristine Awareness " experience as wide space... The practitioners of the Maha-yoga and the Anuyoga are (mentally) obscured by their attachments to Space and Awareness. And with respect to the real meaning of non-duality, since they divide these (Space and Awareness) into two, they fall into de= viation. If these two do not become one without any duality, you will certainly not attain Buddhahood. in the present moment, when (your mind) remains in its own condition without constructing anything, awareness, at that moment, in itself is quite ordinary. And when you look into yourself in this way nakedly (without any discursive thoughts), Since there is only this pure observing, there will be found a lucid clarity without anyone being there who is the observer; only a naked manifest awareness is present. (This awareness) is empty and immaculately pure, not being created by anything whatsoever. This inherent self-awareness does not derive from anything outside itself You discover directly that your own immediate self-awareness is just this (and nothing else), and that it has an inherent self-clarity, which is entirely un-fabricated. How can you say that you are not able to remain in a calm state? http://tinyurl.com/9g36 Karta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 19, 2003 Report Share Posted April 19, 2003 I'm unsure what you are asking about. If " you " exist apart from " space " then there is duality and conflict. ))))))))Shawn on 4/18/03 10:08 AM, satkartar7 at mi_nok wrote: > Shawn or Hur please elaborate on the > space part: since I recall the > " pristine Awareness " experience as > wide space... > > The practitioners of the Maha-yoga > and the Anuyoga are (mentally) > obscured by their attachments to > Space and Awareness. And with respect > to the real meaning of non-duality, > since they divide these (Space and Awareness) into two, they fall into de= > viation. If these two do not > become one without any duality, > you will certainly not attain > Buddhahood. > > in the present moment, when (your > mind) remains in its own condition > without constructing anything, > awareness, at that moment, in itself > is quite ordinary. > > And when you look into yourself in > this way nakedly (without any > discursive thoughts), Since there > is only this pure observing, there > will be found a lucid clarity without > anyone being there who is the > observer; only a naked manifest > awareness is present. (This awareness) > is empty and immaculately pure, > not being created by anything > whatsoever. > > This inherent self-awareness does > not derive from anything outside itself > You discover directly that your own > immediate self-awareness is just > this (and nothing else), and that > it has an inherent self-clarity, > which is entirely un-fabricated. > How can you say that you are not > able to remain in a calm state? > > > http://tinyurl.com/9g36 > > > Karta > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.