Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

witness

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I understand what you mean and you are right! But I simply think

that It might be more.

 

Thanks!

Oscar,

 

Nisargadatta , Pedsie2@a... wrote:

> In a message dated 6/9/2003 8:20:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,

> sinadabrahman writes:

>

> > I'm not trying to play a game I simply try to

> > understand the pur being.

> >

>

> Oscar, read that phrase you wrote above carefully. That's your

problem.

> Who is this " I " who is trying to understand pure being? What is

> understanding?

> What do you understand when understanding? Is it not understanding

only

> comparing concepts? To what can you compare pure being with? Does

it have any

> qualities? You can only understand the false, what you are not.

Once that's

> understood it falls away, and " what is' is there. 'What is' can't,

and has no

> need to understand itself.

>

> Best,

> Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The expression "pure being" is at best redundant, and technically, the

notion of pure/impure does not apply to the term "being".

 

'pure'/'impure' apply to things within manifestation.

"being" as such is the ground of manifestation, and qualifications do not apply to it.

 

What kinds of true statements can be made of the form:

"Being is _____________".

 

The only values that can fill the blank above, that I can see, are effectively synonyms

for "being". For example, "Being is now." Because "now" and "being" are the same.

 

In any such case of a synonym, the value to fill the _________ is a noun.

It seems to me impossible to make a valid statement where the __________ has an

adjective, because "being", as the ground of manifestation, cannot properly be said

to have qualities.

 

This, by the way, is a grammatical issue, not a metaphysical one.

 

A better question, if I may suggest, than asking "what is pure being?", is to ask why

that question seems significant. Really trace back to why that question seems important

and I warrant you will "hit upon something" very interesting.

 

-Bill

In a message dated 6/9/2003 8:20:49 AM Pacific Standard Time, sinadabrahman writes:

I'm not trying to play a game I simply try to understand the pur being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...