Guest guest Posted June 12, 2003 Report Share Posted June 12, 2003 Nisargadatta , " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > To me Freedom is not having any rules. Why should > I not be absorbed by activites? The bee gets absorbed > in drawing the nectar from a flower... > > To me activities just happen. Absorption " just happens " . > There is no *engaging* in such by a any " controlling > entity " . > > Indeed, all acting is through non-acting, inherently. > How could it be otherwise? It is not that we must > change to become non-actors. It is just to *realize* > the inherent non-action of all action. > > > -Bill Yes, indeed, Bill. It's not even a shift to be made. Everything being done already always is of nonaction. Nothing changes at all -- what a huge transformation! And there's no observer of it, and no one to know about it. All observers are of this unobservable, as all knowers are of this unknown -- just as all doings are of this nonaction. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2003 Report Share Posted June 13, 2003 > Nothing changes at all -- what a huge transformation! Marvelous! << And there's no observer of it, and no one to know about it. All observers are of this unobservable, as all knowers are of this unknown -- just as all doings are of this nonaction. >> From one Distiller to another, I do like your Moonshine! -Bill hmmm....I think I'll put this in me cubbard, to have me a little sip later... dan330033 [dan330033] Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:42 PM Nisargadatta Re: action and non-action Bill Nisargadatta , " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > To me Freedom is not having any rules. Why should > I not be absorbed by activites? The bee gets absorbed > in drawing the nectar from a flower... > > To me activities just happen. Absorption " just happens " . > There is no *engaging* in such by a any " controlling > entity " . > > Indeed, all acting is through non-acting, inherently. > How could it be otherwise? It is not that we must > change to become non-actors. It is just to *realize* > the inherent non-action of all action. > > > -Bill Yes, indeed, Bill. It's not even a shift to be made. Everything being done already always is of nonaction. Nothing changes at all -- what a huge transformation! And there's no observer of it, and no one to know about it. All observers are of this unobservable, as all knowers are of this unknown -- just as all doings are of this nonaction. -- Dan ** If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: /mygroups?edit=1 Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta group and click on Save Changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2003 Report Share Posted June 13, 2003 Nisargadatta , " Bill Rishel " <plexus@x> wrote: > > Nothing changes at all -- what a huge transformation! > Marvelous! > > << > And there's no observer of it, and no one to know about > it. > > All observers are of this unobservable, as all knowers > are of this unknown -- just as all doings are of this > nonaction. > >> > From one Distiller to another, > I do like your Moonshine! > > -Bill > > hmmm....I think I'll put this in me cubbard, > to have me a little sip later... Hic! When I get drunk, the whole universe reels! -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.