Guest guest Posted June 16, 2003 Report Share Posted June 16, 2003 This kim is in the relative(dream) world, but 'I' am in the Absolute (real) world. This kim is present because this kim is absent; this kim is absent because this kim is present.So, this kim is illusion.But 'I' am neither present nor absent; 'I' am beyond presence and absence. Who understand the above statement?There is no one to understand; there is no thing to be understand.Phenomenally only the understanding is; noumenally only 'I' am.Phenomenally 'I' am the understanding. Who write this letter?There is no one to write; there is no thing to be written.Phenomenally only the writing is; noumenally only 'I' am.Phenomenally 'I' am the writing. Who send this mail?There is no one to send; there is no thing to be sent.Phenomenally only the sending is; noumenally only 'I' am.Phenomenally 'I' am the sending. ....................... So, 'I' am all the 'functioning(Prajna-ic functioning)' in consciousness. And, 'I' am a witness watching consciousness in consciousness.If consciousness is not there 'I' can not know myself - there is nothing but 'I'- therefore no witnessing.'I' become a witness only a movement in consciousness presents some manifestation to witness.But witnessing and functioning are simultaneous. Any question?Only enquire 'who am I?'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.