Guest guest Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 Dears What is precisely practice that Nisargadatta suggest? " ….focus your mind on I am, which is pure and simple being " 1. Is it like japam/mantra practice, that we must repeat mentally or utter same word continuously? 2. Is it like zazen practice, like mushin (no mind), that we must witness and see our thoughts appear and disappear without interfere or like seeing things/thoughts as they are? 3. Is it like to thinking about these words/sentences and contemplation and make understanding become richer and stable and then we know `I am `with deep faith and understanding become effortlessly? 4. All is correct. (or there is another Interpretation) (Please don't answer with dialectically or metaphysically) Thanks Subhuti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2003 Report Share Posted July 4, 2003 Nisargadatta , " subhuti_gaya " <subhuti_gaya> wrote: > Dears > What is precisely practice that Nisargadatta suggest? > " ….focus your mind on I am, which is pure and simple being " > 1. Is it like japam/mantra practice, that we must repeat mentally or > utter same word continuously? although there's nothing wrong with repeating the words " i am, " for maharaj " i am " is not a mantra. > 2. Is it like zazen practice, like mushin (no mind), that we must > witness and see our thoughts appear and disappear without interfere or > like seeing things/thoughts as they are? again, there's nothing wrong with doing this (and in fact it often happens when we sit in silence) but there's no effort suggested in watching any thoughts. > 3. Is it like to thinking about these words/sentences and > contemplation and make understanding become richer and stable and then > we know `I am `with deep faith and understanding become effortlessly? again, nothing wrong with doing that but no mental process is required for what maharaj suggests. i think that's why hindus call jnana yoga as the simplest but the hardest form of yoga. > 4. All is correct. (or there is another Interpretation) > (Please don't answer with dialectically or metaphysically) > Thanks > Subhuti " i am " and " the sense of being " and consciousness, and even ramana's " self-inquiry " all mean the same. another way to interpret maharaj is... in silence meditate as consciousness on consciousness nothing else http://nisargadatta.net/IamThat1.html http://nisargadatta.net/IamThat2.html hur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.