Guest guest Posted August 21, 2003 Report Share Posted August 21, 2003 Nisargadatta , Sandeep Chatterjee <sandeepc@b...> wrote: > > The dissolution of the question lies, not in an answer, but in the end of the questioner. > i heard something like that from ug the first time and i think that's a crucial point in this bizarre dimension that is called advaita. is it safe to say that when the question disappears so does the questioner? or vice versa...when the questioner disappears so does the question. sounded like the chicken and egg question. maybe...there's no question without the questioners? ok my vision is getting blurry with this hard core nondual talk and i'm seeing double again (not that i was seeing not-two before or anything like that). hur ps. i edited sandeep's quote for clarity. he tends to get carried away with the dots i think. sandeep, did you know that at this group...you're allowed maxiumum 3 dots between words? this restriction does not apply to el of course. she's exempt from the rationing of dots and spaces between the words. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2003 Report Share Posted August 21, 2003 - Hur Guler Nisargadatta Thursday, August 21, 2003 09:54 AM Re: You are not BS. / dots Nisargadatta , Sandeep Chatterjee <sandeepc@b...> wrote:> > The dissolution of the question lies, not in an answer, but in the end of the questioner.> i heard something like that from ug the first time and i think that's a crucial point in this bizarre dimension that is called advaita.is it safe to say that when the question disappears so does the questioner? or vice versa...when the questioner disappears so does the question. sounded like the chicken and egg question. maybe...there's no question without the questioners? Both arise together, both disappear together. Notionally speaking. ok my vision is getting blurry with this hard core nondual talk and i'm seeing double again (not that i was seeing not-two before or anything like that). hurps. i edited sandeep's quote for clarity. he tends to get carried away with the dots i think. sandeep, did you know that at this group...you're allowed maxiumum 3 dots between words? Aw shucks. I do like my dots. this restriction does not apply to el of course. she's exempt from the rationing of dots and spaces between the words. <Grumble> Why does el get to be dotty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2003 Report Share Posted August 21, 2003 <Grumble> Why does el get to be dotty? LOL PSST: He didn't say anything about commas... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 21, 2003 Report Share Posted August 21, 2003 Nisargadatta , " Hur Guler " <hur@n...> wrote: > Nisargadatta , Sandeep Chatterjee > <sandeepc@b...> wrote: > > > > The dissolution of the question lies, not in an answer, but in > the end of the questioner. > > > > i heard something like that from ug the first time and i think that's > a crucial point in this bizarre dimension that is called advaita. > > is it safe to say that when the question disappears so does the > questioner? or vice versa...when the questioner disappears so does > the question. sounded like the chicken and egg question. > maybe...there's no question without the questioners? > > ok my vision is getting blurry with this hard core nondual talk and > i'm seeing double again (not that i was seeing not-two before or > anything like that). > > hur > > ps. i edited sandeep's quote for clarity. he tends to get carried > away with the dots i think. sandeep, did you know that at this > group...you're allowed maxiumum 3 dots between words? > > this restriction does not apply to el of course. she's exempt from > the rationing of dots and spaces between the words. Dear Hur, I am here to represent the public in the matter of the dots. Rationing out dots is like charging a fee to get onto the beach. It's totally absurd. Does someone own the beach? No. Nisarga....a would not approve, I am sure. He was an advocate of free unlimited dots for all, since there is no lack of dots and no one owns them. Please consider updating your policy. Thank you. ;-) Freyja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 > > The dissolution of the question lies, not in an answer, but in > the end of the questioner. > > > > i heard something like that from ug the first time and i think that's > a crucial point in this bizarre dimension that is called advaita. > > is it safe to say that when the question disappears so does the > questioner? or vice versa...when the questioner disappears so does > the question. sounded like the chicken and egg question. > maybe...there's no question without the questioners? > > > Both arise together, both disappear together. > Notionally speaking. > how appropiate; the Daly pic of melting the time > > > ok my vision is getting blurry with this hard core nondual talk and > i'm seeing double again (not that i was seeing not-two before or > anything like that). > > hur > dots remind me of petit mal epilepsy it brakes the rhythm of thought and to Ganga hickuping posts ...of ... praising ...herself huh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.