Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

imaginary encounter with the self

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Nisargadatta , " toombaru " <toombaru> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033>

> wrote:

> > > To identify oneself with the body and yet to seek happiness is

> > > like attempting to cross a river on the back of an alligator.

> > >

> > >

> > > -Sri Ramana Maharshi

> >

> > To disidentify oneself from the body to seek happiness

> > is like forgetting that you're a bird crossing the river

> > on the back of an alligator.

> >

>

No matter which way I turn.....where ever I look......whatever I

> try............I am lost...................There is nothing I can

do.

>

>

> I can't think my way out of this.

> I can't meditate my way out of this.

> I can't pray myself out of this.

>

>

> (probably because there is no " I " ........and no this)

>

>

> LOL

 

 

Yes, well-said, T.

 

The " I " has all kinds of dilemmas, does all kinds

of things to fix them, change them, escape them,

have something better.

 

But with clarity that central to all dilemma is the

" I " -- there is no way out of that one, no way to

fix it or get someplace better.

 

And the universe of many things, qualities

experiences -- all those things

are the " I " in one form or another, projections

of relationships -- to good, to bad, to pleasure,

to pain, to existence, to nonexistence -- all of

which always require and come back to " I " --

 

" I " being the sense of continuity, of maintained identity,

of inherent self-maintained being.

 

-- D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru " <toombaru> wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033>

> > wrote:

> > > > To identify oneself with the body and yet to seek happiness is

> > > > like attempting to cross a river on the back of an alligator.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -Sri Ramana Maharshi

> > >

> > > To disidentify oneself from the body to seek happiness

> > > is like forgetting that you're a bird crossing the river

> > > on the back of an alligator.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > No matter which way I turn.....where ever I look......whatever I

> > try............I am lost...................There is nothing I can

> do.

> >

> >

> > I can't think my way out of this.

> > I can't meditate my way out of this.

> > I can't pray myself out of this.

> >

> >

> > (probably because there is no " I " ........and no this)

> >

> >

> > LOL

>

>

> Yes, well-said, T.

>

> The " I " has all kinds of dilemmas, does all kinds

> of things to fix them, change them, escape them,

> have something better.

>

> But with clarity that central to all dilemma is the

> " I " -- there is no way out of that one, no way to

> fix it or get someplace better.

>

> And the universe of many things, qualities

> experiences -- all those things

> are the " I " in one form or another, projections

> of relationships -- to good, to bad, to pleasure,

> to pain, to existence, to nonexistence -- all of

> which always require and come back to " I " --

>

> " I " being the sense of continuity, of maintained identity,

> of inherent self-maintained being.

>

> -- D.

 

 

Thanks Dan for the above paragraph.

Although the " I " here should be threatened by it...............(since its very

existence is questioned) there seems to be a great resonance with the

words......

 

The " I " of the storm is the moving center around which the manifestation

swirls...

the reference point from which all things

are , and can only be regarded, in relationship to the illusory entity.

 

Identification with entitification is limitation.

 

.........and since it is impossible to identify with nothing.........

 

 

 

.........damnit....for a moment...I almost had it......but it slipped through my

fingers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " toombaru " <toombaru> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033>

wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru " <toombaru>

wrote:

> > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 "

<dan330033>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > To identify oneself with the body and yet to seek happiness

is

> > > > > like attempting to cross a river on the back of an

alligator.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -Sri Ramana Maharshi

> > > >

> > > > To disidentify oneself from the body to seek happiness

> > > > is like forgetting that you're a bird crossing the river

> > > > on the back of an alligator.

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > No matter which way I turn.....where ever I look......whatever

I

> > > try............I am lost...................There is nothing I

can

> > do.

> > >

> > >

> > > I can't think my way out of this.

> > > I can't meditate my way out of this.

> > > I can't pray myself out of this.

> > >

> > >

> > > (probably because there is no " I " ........and no this)

> > >

> > >

> > > LOL

> >

> >

> > Yes, well-said, T.

> >

> > The " I " has all kinds of dilemmas, does all kinds

> > of things to fix them, change them, escape them,

> > have something better.

> >

> > But with clarity that central to all dilemma is the

> > " I " -- there is no way out of that one, no way to

> > fix it or get someplace better.

> >

> > And the universe of many things, qualities

> > experiences -- all those things

> > are the " I " in one form or another, projections

> > of relationships -- to good, to bad, to pleasure,

> > to pain, to existence, to nonexistence -- all of

> > which always require and come back to " I " --

> >

> > " I " being the sense of continuity, of maintained identity,

> > of inherent self-maintained being.

> >

> > -- D.

>

>

> Thanks Dan for the above paragraph.

 

The pleasure was all yours, Toombarudatta, as Jesse Venturadatta

would say :-)

 

> Although the " I " here should be threatened by it...............

 

The " I " being an imagined center which is merely

an activity of contraction, the sense of being

threatened is all that the " I " is ...

 

So, anything and everything will be used to maintain

the sense of threat -- which is why the so-called

" physical body " gets implicated as a dastardly

object when it really isn't. There's no object

there -- just the sense of being threatened by

being an object -- that seems to give a body-sense-as-me

some kind of objective factual status.

 

What the body actually is, is no problem, and can't

be threatened, since it's already constantly in

flux (continually dying) moment to moment.

 

And it's far easier to implicate the body, than

to implicate the " intent to be spiritualized, "

for example by " 'disidentifying' with the body " --

which is just more of the same " I-activity "

as trying to maintain a bodily center through

contraction. Only more pernicious, because

the intent to spiritualize oneself by being

realized and disidentified pretends that it

isn't of the body at all -- when in fact,

that's all it is -- a variation on the theme

of bodily threat -- via the " ultimate escape clause. "

 

> (since its very existence is questioned) there seems to be a great

resonance with the words......

 

Agreed -- its never having existed is revealed immediately.

 

Nothing could have ever existed in fact, this continual

flux would never stand still for it!

 

> The " I " of the storm is the moving center around which the

manifestation swirls...

 

Indeed -- any sense of a center to manifestation

is a version of the " I " activity, yet is the

reference point that all manifestation seems to

require. The imaginary " beginning " of things,

aka " I " --

 

> the reference point from which all things

> are , and can only be regarded, in relationship to the illusory

entity.

 

Indeed!

 

> Identification with entitification is limitation.

 

The idea that there is anything which could have

identified, or which could disidentify, is

equally delusional.

 

> ........and since it is impossible to identify with nothing.........

 

Or for nothing to identify as nothing.

 

> ........damnit....for a moment...I almost had it......but it

slipped through my fingers...

 

Damnit, for a moment I almost lost it .... but then my

fingers appeared again!

 

Smiles,

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...