Guest guest Posted October 2, 2003 Report Share Posted October 2, 2003 <why is it that sooner or later nondualism turns into another school of fundamentalism? is this something that every -ism is destined for? hur > It doesn't, but the nondualism that can be spoken persists because the mind persists. e. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2003 Report Share Posted October 2, 2003 Nisargadatta , ewa1@r... wrote: > <why is it that sooner or later nondualism turns into > another school of fundamentalism? is this something that > every -ism is destined for? > hur > > > > It doesn't, but the nondualism that can be spoken persists > because the mind persists. > e. Very true. Mind is the construction of meaning. Nondualism is a construction of meaning, intended to raise questions about the nature of dualism. Nonconstruction of meaning is not the same as meaninglessness, because nothing is lacking. No mind doesn't mean mind is missing, and it doesn't involve holding meanings as if such holdings made them present -- neither nondual meanings nor dual meanings. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.