Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Montaigne, the nondual

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

(link at the end)

Now, for my part, I had rather be troublesome and indiscreet than a

flatterer and a dissembler. I confess that there may be some mixture

of pride and obstinacy in keeping myself so upright and open as I do,

without any consideration of others; and methinks I am a little too

free, where I ought least to be so, and that I grow hot by the

opposition of respect; and it may be also, that I suffer myself to

follow the propension of my own nature for want of art; using the

same liberty, speech, and countenance towards great persons, that I

bring with me from my own house: I am sensible how much it declines

towards incivility and indiscretion but, besides that I am so bred, I

have not a wit supple enough to evade a sudden question, and to

escape by some evasion, nor to feign a truth, nor memory enough to

retain it so feigned; nor, truly, assurance enough to maintain it,

and so play the brave out of weakness. And therefore it is that I

abandon myself to candour, always to speak as I think, both by

complexion and design, leaving the event to fortune. Aristippus was

wont to say, that the principal benefit he had extracted from

philosophy was that he spoke freely and openly to all.

http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/cgi-bin/sdb/t9.cgi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " eric paroissien "

<vertvetiver@a...> wrote:

> (link at the end)

> Now, for my part, I had rather be troublesome and indiscreet than a

> flatterer and a dissembler. I confess that there may be some

mixture

> of pride and obstinacy in keeping myself so upright and open as I

do,

> without any consideration of others; and methinks I am a little too

> free, where I ought least to be so, and that I grow hot by the

> opposition of respect; and it may be also, that I suffer myself to

> follow the propension of my own nature for want of art; using the

> same liberty, speech, and countenance towards great persons, that I

> bring with me from my own house: I am sensible how much it declines

> towards incivility and indiscretion but, besides that I am so bred,

I

> have not a wit supple enough to evade a sudden question, and to

> escape by some evasion, nor to feign a truth, nor memory enough to

> retain it so feigned; nor, truly, assurance enough to maintain it,

> and so play the brave out of weakness. And therefore it is that I

> abandon myself to candour, always to speak as I think, both by

> complexion and design, leaving the event to fortune. Aristippus was

> wont to say, that the principal benefit he had extracted from

> philosophy was that he spoke freely and openly to all.

> http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/cgi-bin/sdb/t9.cgi

 

 

Eric,

 

why did you post this?

 

sk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " skoggman " <skoggman> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " eric paroissien "

> <vertvetiver@a...> wrote:

> > (link at the end)

> > Now, for my part, I had rather be troublesome and indiscreet than

a

> > flatterer and a dissembler. I confess that there may be some

> mixture

> > of pride and obstinacy in keeping myself so upright and open as I

> do,

> > without any consideration of others; and methinks I am a little

too

> > free, where I ought least to be so, and that I grow hot by the

> > opposition of respect; and it may be also, that I suffer myself

to

> > follow the propension of my own nature for want of art; using the

> > same liberty, speech, and countenance towards great persons, that

I

> > bring with me from my own house: I am sensible how much it

declines

> > towards incivility and indiscretion but, besides that I am so

bred,

> I

> > have not a wit supple enough to evade a sudden question, and to

> > escape by some evasion, nor to feign a truth, nor memory enough

to

> > retain it so feigned; nor, truly, assurance enough to maintain

it,

> > and so play the brave out of weakness. And therefore it is that I

> > abandon myself to candour, always to speak as I think, both by

> > complexion and design, leaving the event to fortune. Aristippus

was

> > wont to say, that the principal benefit he had extracted from

> > philosophy was that he spoke freely and openly to all.

> > http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/cgi-bin/sdb/t9.cgi

>

>

> Eric,

>

> why did you post this?

>

> sk

 

Skoggen i'd like to know you in daily life, you have an interesting

penetration into communication...

i propose to you an even harder rhetorical challenge, you find any

silly text on the net, you post it here and i explain to you why it

is at its right place on this list.

what do you say Skoggen?

gimme a text

eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " eric paroissien "

<vertvetiver@a...> wrote:

> Nisargadatta , " skoggman " <skoggman>

wrote:

> > Nisargadatta , " eric paroissien "

> > <vertvetiver@a...> wrote:

> > > (link at the end)

> > > Now, for my part, I had rather be troublesome and indiscreet

than

> a

> > > flatterer and a dissembler. I confess that there may be some

> > mixture

> > > of pride and obstinacy in keeping myself so upright and open as

I

> > do,

> > > without any consideration of others; and methinks I am a little

> too

> > > free, where I ought least to be so, and that I grow hot by the

> > > opposition of respect; and it may be also, that I suffer myself

> to

> > > follow the propension of my own nature for want of art; using

the

> > > same liberty, speech, and countenance towards great persons,

that

> I

> > > bring with me from my own house: I am sensible how much it

> declines

> > > towards incivility and indiscretion but, besides that I am so

> bred,

> > I

> > > have not a wit supple enough to evade a sudden question, and to

> > > escape by some evasion, nor to feign a truth, nor memory enough

> to

> > > retain it so feigned; nor, truly, assurance enough to maintain

> it,

> > > and so play the brave out of weakness. And therefore it is that

I

> > > abandon myself to candour, always to speak as I think, both by

> > > complexion and design, leaving the event to fortune. Aristippus

> was

> > > wont to say, that the principal benefit he had extracted from

> > > philosophy was that he spoke freely and openly to all.

> > > http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/cgi-bin/sdb/t9.cgi

> >

> >

> > Eric,

> >

> > why did you post this?

> >

> > sk

>

> Skoggen i'd like to know you in daily life, you have an interesting

> penetration into communication...

> i propose to you an even harder rhetorical challenge, you find any

> silly text on the net, you post it here and i explain to you why it

> is at its right place on this list.

> what do you say Skoggen?

> gimme a text

> eric

 

furthermore, have you read some of ChuangTzu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eric,

 

why did you post this?

 

sk

 

 

 

Eric answers enigmatically:

 

 

 

Skoggen i'd like to know you in daily life, you have an interesting

penetration into communication...

 

 

 

sk: they call me the " Penetrator " :-)

 

 

i propose to you an even harder rhetorical challenge, you find any silly text on

the net, you post it here and i explain to you why it is at its right place on

this list.

 

 

 

sk: Refreshing surprise, I thought this was the hardest.

 

 

what do you say Skoggen?

 

 

 

sk: you didn't answer the question.

 

 

gimme a text

 

 

 

sk: You already have it.

 

 

 

the perforator

 

 

 

 

 

 

Protect your identity with Mail AddressGuard

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> > Eric,

> >

> > why did you post this?

> >

> > sk

 

 

 

furthermore, have you read some of ChuangTzu?

 

 

 

sk: Yes, the menu.

 

 

 

the perpetrator

 

 

 

 

 

Protect your identity with Mail AddressGuard

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " eric paroissien "

<vertvetiver@a...> wrote:

> (link at the end)

> Now, for my part, I had rather be troublesome and indiscreet than a

> flatterer and a dissembler. I confess that there may be some

mixture

> of pride and obstinacy in keeping myself so upright and open as I

do,

> without any consideration of others; and methinks I am a little too

> free, where I ought least to be so, and that I grow hot by the

> opposition of respect; and it may be also, that I suffer myself to

> follow the propension of my own nature for want of art; using the

> same liberty, speech, and countenance towards great persons, that I

> bring with me from my own house: I am sensible how much it declines

> towards incivility and indiscretion but, besides that I am so bred,

I

> have not a wit supple enough to evade a sudden question, and to

> escape by some evasion, nor to feign a truth, nor memory enough to

> retain it so feigned; nor, truly, assurance enough to maintain it,

> and so play the brave out of weakness. And therefore it is that I

> abandon myself to candour, always to speak as I think, both by

> complexion and design, leaving the event to fortune. Aristippus was

> wont to say, that the principal benefit he had extracted from

> philosophy was that he spoke freely and openly to all.

> http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/cgi-bin/sdb/t9.cgi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nisargadatta , " eric paroissien "

<vertvetiver@a...> wrote:

> (link at the end)

> Now, for my part, I had rather be troublesome and indiscreet than a

> flatterer and a dissembler. I confess that there may be some

mixture

> of pride and obstinacy in keeping myself so upright and open as I

do,

> without any consideration of others; and methinks I am a little too

> free, where I ought least to be so, and that I grow hot by the

> opposition of respect; and it may be also, that I suffer myself to

> follow the propension of my own nature for want of art; using the

> same liberty, speech, and countenance towards great persons, that I

> bring with me from my own house: I am sensible how much it declines

> towards incivility and indiscretion but, besides that I am so bred,

I

> have not a wit supple enough to evade a sudden question, and to

> escape by some evasion, nor to feign a truth, nor memory enough to

> retain it so feigned; nor, truly, assurance enough to maintain it,

> and so play the brave out of weakness. And therefore it is that I

> abandon myself to candour, always to speak as I think, both by

> complexion and design, leaving the event to fortune. Aristippus was

> wont to say, that the principal benefit he had extracted from

> philosophy was that he spoke freely and openly to all.

> http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/cgi-bin/sdb/t9.cgi

 

Gotta love the French! They put Krishnamurti's ramblings to shame.

Jeez.

 

Montaigne and Derrida -- what a pair. :-)

 

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...