Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Nisargadatta , " judirhodes " <judirhodes@z...> wrote: > *********** > There is no state, there is no experience, no enjoyment that I can > point to that is outside of what is, in the right here and now. In > other words, there is no " me " that is standing apart or split off > in " space " somewhere to view or to even witness. There is only what > is. And I am that. It's altogether, it's wholeness. It is " no > seeking. " It is just being with/as what is already here, with > whatever is??? It doesn't seem to matter. It makes no difference what > the " whatever " is. There is no outside there is no inside, there is > no looking. There is WHAT IS! Period, period, period! > > This ain't rocket science folks! :-) > > Sheesh! > > Judi Like the famous zen dude who yelled at his student: " Just this, just this!! " So, even if there is contraction and a sense of " me " here, that is fine too. No need to be rid of that sense of " me " to try to get to some kind of state where there is no me. That's more of the same nonsense. The sense of separation is what is, and whatever else you want is just resistance and following that resistance will only create more tension/suffering. Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 > > > > This ain't rocket science folks! :-) > > > > Sheesh! > > > > Judi > > Like the famous zen dude who yelled at his student: > > " Just this, just this!! " > > So, even if there is contraction and a sense of " me " here, that is > fine too. ***** What does " fine " have to do with it? Feelings are secondary and besides the point. In other words, if the horse is already out of the barn and whether you like it or not has nothing to do with the fact that horse is out of the barn. Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Nisargadatta , " judirhodes " <judirhodes@z...> wrote: > > ***** What does " fine " have to do with it? Feelings are secondary and > besides the point. In other words, if the horse is already out of the > barn and whether you like it or not has nothing to do with the fact > that horse is out of the barn. > > > Judi Exactly. So, fight it (not fine) or don't (fine). It is what it is. Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Nisargadatta , " josesiem " <josesiem> wrote: > Nisargadatta , " judirhodes " <judirhodes@z...> > wrote: > > > > ***** What does " fine " have to do with it? Feelings are secondary > and > > besides the point. In other words, if the horse is already out of > the > > barn and whether you like it or not has nothing to do with the fact > > that horse is out of the barn. > > > > > > Judi > > Exactly. So, fight it (not fine) or don't (fine). It is what it is. > > Joe ********** What " it " ? :-) I don't see an " it " . :-) Judi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 25, 2003 Report Share Posted November 25, 2003 Nisargadatta , " judirhodes " <judirhodes@z...> wrote: > > > > Exactly. So, fight it (not fine) or don't (fine). It is what it is. > > > > Joe > > ********** What " it " ? :-) I don't see an " it " . :-) > > Judi Fine! -- Cousin It :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.