[JK] Is anyone reading, but us chickens?

[Guest guest]

It is hard to believe that you posted this message about the Krishnamurti poll

on another list, which has noithing to do with this list. I have received it

twice. I do not know hoiw many others lists you sent it to, as fortunately I am

not on them. STOP is your one word, huh? You cannot. It is sad. Come out here

and say: " I, Pete, cannot stop. " Say it. Interesting that you have not posted

the below response to you on that I gave here on this other list. I will do it

for you. Sincerely, Wry

-

seesaw1us

J_Krishnamurti

Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:48 AM

Re: [JK] Is anyone reading, but us chickens?

 

 

- Thank you, sweet love, for your kind words. If I didn't know better

I would think those words come from and angry childish ego. But nah,

it's only that you would prefer to be along and undisturbed with your

one or two disciples. May I be so bold as to offer a sugestion, start

your own list. That way you could ban disruptive pigs like me. You

could name it " The Wrath of Wry list. " Uh? Nice ring to it.

 

-- In J_Krishnamurti , " wry " <wry1111@e...> wrote:

> Because of people like you with la la sleeping zen fantasies of

sleeping dog and sleeping pete (zzzzzzzzz) having the same

consciousness (which exists beyond you and the dog) and writing poems

about pointing ones dick (somehow such an ugly word) at the moon, and

other such garbage, serious enquirers set their list preferences to

no-email. So, you are right, there are probably only a few people on

here. Plus you are writing these stupid messages and posting them on

multiple lists. It is not an individual response to this list--so

mechanical. Each list is unique. In all truth, you cannot STOP, but

only talk about it. It is not possible for you. to " stop " . It is

just more lip service. Sincerely, Wry

> -

> seesaw1us

> J_Krishnamurti

> Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:13 AM

> [JK] Is anyone reading, but us chickens?

>

>

> j_krisnamurty is a list with 374 members. Recently the owner

> conducted a poll about the nature of self. Only 5 answer. All were

> posters. There are like ten habitual posters. So, why not even a

> single non-poster out of 364, answered? Does membrship numbers

mean

> anyone is reading? I think not.

>

> Pete

>

>

>

>

>